Monday 18 May 2015

Paperwork and documenting collecting histories

One of the issues that I keep mentioning is the need to authenticate documentation. Paul Barford has provided an excellent example in his discussion of material from Palmyra surfacing on eBay. He mentions an "Unconditionally guaranteed authentic" Palmyrene funerary portrait that is being offered on eBay for $13,500 (and on offer today). Its collecting history ("provenance") is provided: "Ex: European art market; Early American private collection, 1960's".

However the invoice indicates that the stela was flown from Beirut to JFK (arriving on 10 April 2006; customs entry 10 November 2006) by Malev.

So are we supposed to believe that this portrait surfaced on the European art market (no evidence posted) and then passed into an "Early American private collection" in the 1960s (no evidence posted)? And then shipped from USA to Lebanon (no evidence provided) so that it could be returned to the USA in 2006 (invoice provided).

This raises all sorts of issues not least the paperwork seen by US Customs in November 2006.

Bookmark and Share so Your Real Friends Know that You Know

1 comment:

lalbertson said...

I wrote on this piece on ARCA's blog in November, but at the time had not seen (maybe they added) the import license.

http://art-crime.blogspot.it/2014_11_01_archive.html

The Oct 12, 2006 date on the import document Paul pointed out seems to contradict the "Provenance- Ex: European art market; Early American private collection, 1960's" statement listed in November.

The Stern Collection in New York: Cycladic or Cycladicising?

Courtesy of Christos Tsirogiannis There appears to be excitement about the display of 161 Cycladicising objects at New York's Metropolit...