tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972497915033440413.post187907337484338650..comments2024-03-20T18:15:41.858+00:00Comments on Looting Matters: Christie's and the Art Loss RegisterDavid Gillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13164794689385933318noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972497915033440413.post-63811642502577397202012-06-17T05:33:48.041+01:002012-06-17T05:33:48.041+01:00Most dealers in dugup antiquities do not reveal to...Most dealers in dugup antiquities do not reveal to the public the details of where the individual objects they handle actually come from.Paul Barfordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10443302899233809948noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972497915033440413.post-77714054639850075132012-06-11T13:49:04.741+01:002012-06-11T13:49:04.741+01:00I agree, thus, it is reason to be cautious. But a...I agree, thus, it is reason to be cautious. But a much bigger issue is that these photos have not been made available to the public in their entirety.Alfredo De La Fehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16438544659388091161noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972497915033440413.post-8623608530941197962012-06-11T05:17:17.276+01:002012-06-11T05:17:17.276+01:00How about treating items in such a "dossier&q...How about treating items in such a "dossier" as items known to be have been sold by a dealer who is known to have dealt in looted objects? <br /><br />If that is the ONLY verifiable provenance that object now has, it is tainted.Paul Barfordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10443302899233809948noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972497915033440413.post-65657032666010940352012-06-09T06:56:17.515+01:002012-06-09T06:56:17.515+01:00While an item that happens to have a photograph in...While an item that happens to have a photograph in one of the "dossiers" (Medicci is one) certainly would give reason for caution, you are making a pretty bold assumption that all of the photographs found were of items which had been "recently" looted. (As opposed to looted prior to whatever cutoff date is valid for the country in question - but for the sake of argument let's say 1970)<br /><br />All dealers maintain photofiles. Some items may have been offered to said dealers and a photograph taken to obtain opinions on specific pieces before they were purchased and/or sold. Or, photographs could have been taken before and after restoration work of pieces that are from "old" collections. <br /><br />While I certainly agree that a photograph from the "Medicci dossier" should be of concern, it does not establish that a specific item is "looted" as fact. It is only one piece of evidence that must be taken into consideration.<br /><br />While it would be irresponsible to dismiss the fact that a photograph exists in one of these dossiers it is also irresponsible to label all items in those photographs as positively looted.Alfredo De La Fehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16438544659388091161noreply@blogger.com