The meeting of CPAC in March will be discussing the proposed extension of the cultural property agreement with Greece. The webpage is illustrated with an image of a Cycladic figure currently on long-term loan to New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art as part of the Leonard N. Stern collection. The figure appears in the catalogue of the Keros Haul (no. 170). Is the use of a figure apparently derived from (or associated with) a notorious example of looting in the Cyclades really the best choice of image? What about other figures from the Haul that reside in other North American collections?
Members of CPAC may find it helpful to read about the Stern collection:
Gill, D. W. J. 2025. "Artwashing the Cyclades: The Leonard N. Stern Collection at the Metropolitan Museum of Art." BMCR.Tsirogiannis, C., D. W. J. Gill, and C. Chippindale. 2025. "A Corrupt Cycladic Corpus of Marble Figures." Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology & Heritage Studies 13: 203–33.Gill, D. W. J., and C. Tsirogiannis. 2025. "The Stern Collection of Cycladic Figures and the Metropolitan Museum of Art." MeditArch 38: 1–24.