Skip to main content

Evidence and legal patience: seeking clarification

Peter Tompa (Washington lobbyist and coin collector) has been pressing me --- "anxiously" --- to comment on the acquisition of a dekadrachm by a national numismatic museum. The prompt was certainly an interesting one and it brought me directly to a letter signed by Tompa (and posted on the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild (ACCG) website). The communication, sent from Dillingham & Murphy LLP, was addressed to the Cultural Property Advisory Committee (February 1, 2007) and related to the 'Request for Import Restrictions on Coins at the Behest of the Republic of Cyprus'.

In the letter Tompa comments on the movement of ancient coins and specifically those minted on Cyprus. In note 10 he observes that Athenian dekadrachms are not found in Greece. He then slips in an allegation about a recently acquired dekadrachm "which is thought to have been found in Turkey". Unlike the rest of the material in his letter such a comment is unsupported.

Who "thought" that this coin was found in Turkey? What are Tompa's documented sources for his information? What is his due diligence process? Does he know which (coin) dealers handled the dekadrachm? Will he confirm that that the dealer(s) is / are not linked in any way with the FOIA request relating to coins from Cyprus?

Such questions need to be asked because Tompa's "postings" sometimes need to be seen in context.

Tompa urges me to make an instant comment.

But it made me stop and think: Tompa and I have something in common. We both value empirical evidence.

So what is the basis of his allegation?


David- The allegation about the Decadrachm was made by Arthur Brand (a sometimes contributor to items posted on the SAFE web site) in a book he has published, the name of which escapes me. I have no idea which dealer(s) handled the coin accessioned by the Greek National Museum or whether Brand's allegations are true. That, however, is still irrelevant to my simple question. Do you think that Greece should return to Turkey a valuable ancient Greek coin that allegedly was removed from Turkey illicitly? Certainly, you can answer that.

By the way, since you constantly harp on me being a "lobbyist" (when archaeologists lobby on these issues as well), please disclose to your readers if you have received any money from the Greek Government or related entities related to your studies in general or work in the cultural property field. I would particularly be interested to learn if you attended that conference last year at the Acropolis Museum, and, if so, who paid for your attendance. The Senate and House LDA database should give you an idea of how much the firms I have been associated with have received for what lobbying I have done on behalf of two numismatic trade associations (lobbying work for ACCG has been done "pro bono") but there is no way to look up how much Greece has spent spreading its nationalistic message that everything and anything that is ancient Greek, anywhere in the world, belongs to Greece.


Peter Tompa
David Gill said…
You must mean Arthur Brand's Het verboden Judas-evangelie en de schat van Carchemish (Soesterberg : Aspekt, 2006) [WorldCat].
Are you sure he is "a sometimes contributor" on the SAFE site? I did a search for postings by (or about) him on SAFE Corner without any results. Or do you mean he has left comments there?

Have you read Brand's book? I presume you must have done in order to allude to this dekadrachm in your letter to CPAC. Or did you receive the information through another source? Have you checked it out? I think you should verify the details of who handled the dekadrachm.

I am so grateful to you for raising this as an issue.

With best wishes
David- You don't seem to want to answer my questions, but I will answer your question as best I can. I recall that Brand has been quoted in one or more stories on the SAFE website. They may have been in PDF form, which is why you can't find them.

I did not (and could not) read his book (which in Dutch), but a summary was previously posted on the VanRijn web site, which is no longer active.

I suppose there may be at least a grain of truth in what Brand has written in his book, but as with VanRijn, his mentor, I would be very careful before accepting it all as fact.

There are certainly unprovenanced hoards that have come to market. As you know, I advocate systems akin to the UK Treasure Act and PAS to help ensure that they get properly recorded. Countries like Greece are certainly free to decide what laws are best for them, but that does not mean we should automatically support their views of cultural property or question them when they seem to be acting inconsistently with what they preach.


Peter Tompa

Popular posts from this blog

Codename: Ainsbrook

I have been watching (UK) Channel 4's Time Team this evening. The programme looked at an undisclosed field (under a potato crop) where a Viking burial had been found. The location in Yorkshire was so sensitive that it was given a codename: Ainsbrook. Here is the summary:
In late 2003 two metal detectorists were working in a field in Yorkshire. They found 'treasure' buried just beneath the surface – a collection of Viking material next to a body. Although they had been detecting on the site for a number of years, during which time they had made large numbers of finds, nothing they had uncovered previously compared with this. They decided to share their discovery with archaeologists.The programme explored the tension between metal-detectorists and the English Heritage sponsored archaeologists putting six trenches into the field based on a geo-physical survey. Finds made by the metal-detectorists did not easily map onto the archaeological features.

Part of the programme had an …

The scale of the returns to Italy

I have been busy working on an overview, "Returning Archaeological Objects to Italy". The scale of the returns to Italy from North American collections and galleries is staggering: in excess of 350 objects. This is clearly the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the material that has surfaced on the market without a history that can be traced back to the period before 1970. 

I will provide more information in due course, but the researcher is a reminder that we need to take due diligence seriously when it comes to making acquisitions.

Stele returns to Greece

The Hellenic Ministry of Culture has announced (Saturday 8 September 2018) that a stele that had been due to be auctioned at Sotheby's in London in June 2017 has been returned to Greece (Friday 7 September 2018). The identification had been made by Cambridge-based forensic archaeologist Dr Christos Tsirogiannis.

It appeared that the stele had been supplied with a falsified history as its presence with Becchina until 1990 contradicted the published sale catalogue entry. It then moved into the hands of George Ortiz.

A year ago it was suggested that Sotheby's should contact the Greek authorities. Those negotiations appear to have concluded successfully.

The 4th century BC stele fragment, with the personal name, Hestiaios, will be displayed in the Epigraphic Museum in Athens. It appears to have come from a cemetery in Attica.