Skip to main content

Two Canosan kraters returned to Italy

This time last year I was commenting on identifications made by Cambridge researcher Christos Tsirogiannis. He spotted that a pair of Canosan krater that were due to be auctioned in the June 2012 sale at Christie's Rockefeller Plaza could be identified from the polaroids in the Medici Dossier.

The research did not go unnoticed. The pair of kraters were returned to Italy on 14 September 2012. Investigative journalist Fabio Isman informs us that they are currently in an exhibition of repatriated antiquities at the Museo Nazionale di Castel Sant' Angelo in Rome (20 May -5 November 2013).

Tsirogiannis has written up the work for the next number of the Journal of Art Crime (2013). The detail is telling but readers of LM can wait for the publication.

This return demonstrates that items identified from the Medici Dossier (and this should be extended to the Becchina and Schinoussa archives) are perceived as "toxic". This is not the first time that such a return has been made from this auction house.

Readers of LM will be aware that Tsirogiannis has made a number of identifications in the June 2013 auction (although not all the pieces have been discussed). Two things need to happen. First, senior officers at Christie's need to look closely at what appears to be a flawed due diligence process in their "ancient art" department. Second, somebody should be contacting the Italian authorities as a matter of urgency.

Bookmark and Share so Your Real Friends Know that You Know


kyri said…
or maybe someone should make the photographic archives available so auction houses can do their due diligence without having to rely on the made up collecting historys provided by consignors.many of the medici pieces have been published in catalogues as long as 30 years ago,are you suggesting that they should refuse everything without a %100 verifiable collecting history going back to 1970? that would rule out %75 of antiquities on the market.
David Gill said…
Kyri, thank you for your comment. Are you suggesting that 75% of the antiquities on the market have surfaced "recently" i.e. post 1970? I suspect the figure is even higher.
kyri said…
hi david,personally i believe that a large proportion of antiquities on the market have surfaced recently,its difficult to argue anything else considering the well documented high status cases that have come to light and i believe, that it is an ongoing problem [allthough not so much from italy as was the case with medici]as for the exact proportion,that is anybodys guess,its an imposible figure to my opinion there are perfectly licit pieces that have just lost their provenance over the years.we had the recent case of the roman sarcophagus found hidden and forgotten in a garden and i myself have bought antiquities from a provincial auction house,from a deceased estate,which came with bm letters dated from the 1940s. the auctionear didnt have a clue as to how significant they were,they could have easily been thrown away and the pieces "orphaned".you say you suspect the figure is even higher than %75 but the simple truth is nobody knows and we are all speculating.i agree that certain masterpieces must have been known/published before 1970 if their collecting histories are to be believed but the lowly apulian bell krater may have been hidden away in an attic for decades.if an auction house has a verifiable provenance going back to the mid 80s thats a good collecting history for most has been said many times before but i will say it again,collecting histories/provenance had knowhere near the importance pre 1990s as it has now and to condemn outright,every piece which hasnt verifiable records pre 1970s is wrong in my eyes.i also collect antiquities auction catalogues and the sales in the 1930s were stuffed full of antiquities.the sothebys 1931 sale had 387 lots [yes387]with some fantastic greek vases on offer,with lots of plates and some great photos.there was alot of stuff that 1931 sale,only 20-30 lots had any collecting history mentiond.the auction houses are trying to do their due diligence,with every lot having some form of collecting history published in the catalogue,publishing all the photo archives will help them,isnt that what you want?

Popular posts from this blog

Marble bull's head from the temple of Eshmun

Excavations at the temple of Eshmun in Lebanon recovered a marble bull's head. It is now suggested that it was this head, apparently first published in 1967, that was placed on loan to New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art (Tom Mashberg, "Met Museum Turns Over Another Relic With Disputed Past to Prosecutors", New York Times August 1, 2017 ). The head is reported to have been handed over to the Manhattan district attorney after a request was received from the Lebanese authorities.

It is suggested that the head may have been looted from an archaeological storage area at Byblos in the 1980s during the Lebanese civil war. Mashberg has rehearsed the recent collecting history:
The owners of the bull’s head, Lynda and William Beierwaltes of Colorado, say they have clear title to the item and have sued Manhattan prosecutors for its return.  The Beierwaltes bought the head from a dealer in London in 1996 for more than $1 million and then sold it to another collector, Michael …

The Toledo skyphos and a Swiss private collection

The Attic red-figured skyphos attributed to the Kleophon painter in the Toledo Museum of Art (inv. 1982.88) is now coming under further scrutiny following the research of Dr Christos Tsirogiannis. The skyphos shows Hephaistos returning to Olympos.

Tsirogiannis has identified what appears to be this skyphos in five photographs in the Medici Dossier. The museum acknowledged that the skyphos had resided in a 'private Swiss collection'. Tsirogiannis suggests that this is probably a reference to Medici.

Enquiries to the museum by Tsirogiannis elicited the information that the skyphos had been acquired from Nicholas Koutoulakis (although that information does not appear on the museum's online catalogue).

The curatorial team at the Toledo Museum of Art will, no doubt, be contacting the Italian authorities to discuss the future residence of the skyphos.

For further discussion of the Toledo Museum of Art on LM see here.

Tsirogiannis, C. 2017. "Nekyia: Museum ethics an…

Metropolitan Museum of Art hands over Paestan krater

In May 2014 I commented on a Paestan krater acquired by New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art after it had been identified by Dr Christos Tsirogiannis in photographic images seized from Giacomo Medici. Tsirogiannis published his full concerns in the Journal of Art Crime in 2014, but it has taken a further three years for the museum to respond.

The krater showing Dionysos in a hand-drawn cart was purchased in 1989 from the Bothmer Purchase Fund (details from the Museum's website, inv. 1989.11.4). The krater surfaced through Sotheby's New York in June 1989.

It is unclear who consigned the krater to Sotheby's New York.

It has now been revealed that the krater has been handed over to the US authorities after a warrant had been issued (Tom Mashberg, "Ancient Vase Seized From Met Museum on Suspicion It Was Looted", New York Times July 31, 2018).

It appears that the museum did make an attempt to resolve the case in December 2016. Mashberg notes:
The Met, for its par…