Skip to main content

Recently surfaced antiquities on the market

The results of the Christie's Rockefeller Centre sale are now available. Readers will know some of the items identified from the Becchina, Medici, and Schinousa archives by Cambridge University researcher Christos Tsirogiannis went under the hammer.

  • Lot 540: Euboean black-figured amphora. Sold: $15,000. Estimate: $15,000-$20,000. [LM]
  • Lot 543: East Greek bronze warrior. Unsold. Estimate: $30,000-$50,000. [LM]
  • Lot 546: Attic black-figured column-krater, attributed to the Bucci painter. Sold: $37,500. Estimate: $35,000-$55,000. [LM]
  • Lot 600: Gnathian bell-krater. Unsold. Estimate: $10,000-$15,000. [LM]
  • Lot 610: Marble Apollo. Sold: $195,750. Estimate: $200,000-$300-000. [LM]

Why did Christie's due diligence search fail to identify these pieces?

Buyers of three of these pieces may yet find that they will be contacted by the Italian authorities.

Bookmark and Share so Your Real Friends Know that You Know


Emmanuel said…
“Buyers of three of these pieces may yet find that they will be contacted by the Italian authorities”.

Maybe yes, maybe not... What if the “buyers” of those three items are in fact the consignors? Is it not worth trying creating one more dummy provenance entry for few additional dollars and – at the same time – protect your consigned item of being characterised as “unsold”? I would assume that the consignors of such toxic antiquities, which have undoubtedly been identified from the Medici Dossier and the Becchina and Schinousa Archives, are more than willing “buying” one more potential “bought in good faith” excuse statement for any future legal actions against them, if the country involved does not react legally as soon as the item appears in the catalogue and before the actual auction date. In such a case, the extra commission paid by the “buyers” of their own items would be just a fraction of their profit in few years time, when those items re-enter the market...
David Gill said…
Are you assuming that the Italian authorities did not contact the auction house?
Emmanuel said…
Dear David,
It is my belief that the country, or countries, involved should have stopped the auction by presenting to the court all the evidence available. I am sure the evidence in the archives used by Christos Tsirogiannis in identifying the items as toxic, are also available in the local authorities concerned. The fact that those specific items were not withdrawn before the auction was started does not mean that the auction house was confident about the thoroughness of the due diligence process followed. So, either the country or countries involved have unsuccessfully tried to stop the items being auctioned (nothing relevant on the local press, at least in Greece), or, they haven’t (yet?) contacted the auction house for some good reason. Other possible explanations are more than welcome...

Popular posts from this blog

Codename: Ainsbrook

I have been watching (UK) Channel 4's Time Team this evening. The programme looked at an undisclosed field (under a potato crop) where a Viking burial had been found. The location in Yorkshire was so sensitive that it was given a codename: Ainsbrook. Here is the summary:
In late 2003 two metal detectorists were working in a field in Yorkshire. They found 'treasure' buried just beneath the surface – a collection of Viking material next to a body. Although they had been detecting on the site for a number of years, during which time they had made large numbers of finds, nothing they had uncovered previously compared with this. They decided to share their discovery with archaeologists.The programme explored the tension between metal-detectorists and the English Heritage sponsored archaeologists putting six trenches into the field based on a geo-physical survey. Finds made by the metal-detectorists did not easily map onto the archaeological features.

Part of the programme had an …

The scale of the returns to Italy

I have been busy working on an overview, "Returning Archaeological Objects to Italy". The scale of the returns to Italy from North American collections and galleries is staggering: in excess of 350 objects. This is clearly the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the material that has surfaced on the market without a history that can be traced back to the period before 1970. 

I will provide more information in due course, but the researcher is a reminder that we need to take due diligence seriously when it comes to making acquisitions.

Stele returns to Greece

The Hellenic Ministry of Culture has announced (Saturday 8 September 2018) that a stele that had been due to be auctioned at Sotheby's in London in June 2017 has been returned to Greece (Friday 7 September 2018). The identification had been made by Cambridge-based forensic archaeologist Dr Christos Tsirogiannis.

It appeared that the stele had been supplied with a falsified history as its presence with Becchina until 1990 contradicted the published sale catalogue entry. It then moved into the hands of George Ortiz.

A year ago it was suggested that Sotheby's should contact the Greek authorities. Those negotiations appear to have concluded successfully.

The 4th century BC stele fragment, with the personal name, Hestiaios, will be displayed in the Epigraphic Museum in Athens. It appears to have come from a cemetery in Attica.