 |
Returned from Dallas.
Source: Dallas Museum of Art |
Julia Halperin and Javier Pes have written about the attitude of North American museums towards repatriation ("
US museums' about-face on restitution",
The Art Newspaper, February 2014). There are comments from Kaywin Feldman, director of the Minneapolis Institute of Arts, who now holds a more informed position than the one presented in
December 2010: "It’s been a landslide change in collecting policy, procedures and ethics". There is a reference to the return of the
Athenian red-figured krater (September 2011) that was recognised from the Medici Dossier and thence to hands of Robin Symes. Maxwell Anderson was also interview indicating his proactive position that led to the voluntary return of a range of objects from
Dallas.
Feldman reports that some potential donors are "frustrated" by the new
AAMD Guidelines. But it has probably saved some potentially damaging acquisitions. And Fordham University would have been wise to have researched a donation from a
private collection.
The report mentions the Egyptian mummy mask in the
St Louis Art Museum that is known to have been excavated at Saqqara but somehow left its place in an archaeological store. Although the collecting history that was provided
cannot be accurate, an official from SLAM was quoted as saying that the museum's "position on its legal ownership of the mask has not changed". This position contrasts with Anderson's transparent ethical stance for Dallas.
I am quoted in the report and call for improved documentation for acquired objects. Published collecting histories need to demonstrate the authenticated sources.
And the
Art Newspaper notes that social media allow individuals to identify material that has been acquired my museums. So we can expect more returns.
Comments