The remaining question is why the due diligence process conducted by the two major auction houses were unable to detect these objects? We also note that one of the auction-houses appeared to be the vendor or co-vendor of one of the pieces.
Wednesday, 2 April 2014
Becchina, Medici and the London market
Peter Watson has reported in today's Times (London) that the objects linked to Gianfranco Becchina and Giacomo Medici have been withdrawn from auction in London. This is due to identifications made by Cambridge University researcher Dr Christos Tsirogiannis.
The remaining question is why the due diligence process conducted by the two major auction houses were unable to detect these objects? We also note that one of the auction-houses appeared to be the vendor or co-vendor of one of the pieces.
The remaining question is why the due diligence process conducted by the two major auction houses were unable to detect these objects? We also note that one of the auction-houses appeared to be the vendor or co-vendor of one of the pieces.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Further Returns to Türkiye
Septimius Severus. Source: Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek It has been announced that the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek in Copenhagen will be returning the ...
-
Source: Sotheby's A marble head of Alexander the Great has been seized in New York (reported in " Judge Orders Return of Ancien... -
The Fire of Hephaistos exhibition included "seven bronzes ... that have been linked to the Bubon cache of imperial statues" (p. 1...
-
Courtesy of Christos Tsirogiannis There appears to be excitement about the display of 161 Cycladicising objects at New York's Metropolit...
3 comments:
the auction houses could never conduct proper due diligence while the becchina and medici archives are not made public and are only made available to a select few.they use the ALR which is next to useless as these pieces have never been reported stolen.to accuse them of not doing due diligence when it comes to pieces related to these two archives is a bit unfair and you know it.
kyri
Kyri
You assume that the ALR does not have access to these databases.
David
hi david,yes i do,otherwise they are not fit for purpose.there have been to many pieces popping up over the years which leads me to believe they dont have access to the archives,or at least full access.do you know different??it would be nice if the archives were made public so we can all have a look.
kyri.
Post a Comment