Skip to main content

Lord Owen on the Parthenon Marbles

Lord Owen has written a letter to The Times (June 15, 2009) about the Hellenic Ministry of Culture's rejection of the offer of a loan of the Parthenon sculptures presently residing in the British Museum. The letter comments:
The only way that the Elgin Marbles can make periodic visits to the new Acropolis Museum, which is highly desirable, is if there is an EU cultural treaty couched in general terms allowing for the transfer of antiquities between the museums of member states in a way that guarantees, under international law, all aspects of their movement. In this way the EU would be demonstrating that it is a unique international organisation capable of ensuring the cultural heritage of its citizens without establishing precedents that could lead to the return to their country of origin of many objets d’art which enrich the museums of the EU member states.
For the full letter click here.

Comments

DR.KWAME OPOKU said…
The letter of Lord Owen is remarkable in many ways but above all, in the way it reveals residual racial and nationalistic attitudes among some members of the British ruling classes.

The noble Lord writes as if the United Nations and UNESCO did not exist and fails to take into account the mechanisms that exist for resolving such cultural disputes, provided the parties are ready to act in good faith.

Owen seeks to elevate a bilateral problem into a general problem. A dispute between Britain and Greece is turned into a general International Law question but this generalization is immediately limited and turned into a European Union problem. The fear of the noble Lord is that a precedent could be set for returning stolen/looted cultural objects and might enable others outside the European Union to seek the repatriation of their looted cultural artefacts. The Africans and the Asians might be knocking at the door of the British Museum for the return of thousands of cultural objects, including the Benin bronzes,
that were stolen in the colonial period.

Lord Owen’s solution is to have: “EU cultural treaty couched in general terms allowing for the transfer of antiquities between the museums of member states in a way that guarantees, under international law, all aspects of their movement”. This would enable the parties to do whatever they agree on. Maybe Lord Owen should be informed that the United Kingdom and Greece have been discussing this matter within the frame work of UNESCO without any result owing to the intransigent attitude of Britain, primarily supporting the position of the British Museum in a matter where British Parliamentarians should take an independent view of the issue so as to reflect the view of the overwhelming majority of British people who are in favour of returning the Parthenon/Elgin Marbles.

A solution to the issue of the Parthenon/Elgin Marbles which is other than bilateral but at the same time seeks to limit its generalization to the European Union is clearly a reflection of a way of thinking that will disappoint all those who truly believe in International Law, the United Nations and UNESCO.

Dr.Kwame Opoku

Popular posts from this blog

Codename: Ainsbrook

I have been watching (UK) Channel 4's Time Team this evening. The programme looked at an undisclosed field (under a potato crop) where a Viking burial had been found. The location in Yorkshire was so sensitive that it was given a codename: Ainsbrook. Here is the summary:
In late 2003 two metal detectorists were working in a field in Yorkshire. They found 'treasure' buried just beneath the surface – a collection of Viking material next to a body. Although they had been detecting on the site for a number of years, during which time they had made large numbers of finds, nothing they had uncovered previously compared with this. They decided to share their discovery with archaeologists.The programme explored the tension between metal-detectorists and the English Heritage sponsored archaeologists putting six trenches into the field based on a geo-physical survey. Finds made by the metal-detectorists did not easily map onto the archaeological features.

Part of the programme had an …

George Ortiz collection to be displayed in London

Christie's is due to display part of the former collection of the late George Ortiz in London in a non-selling show to mark the 25th anniversary of the exhibition at the Royal Academy. There is a statement on the Christie's website ("The Ortiz Collection — ‘proof that the past is in all of us’"). Max Bernheimer is quoted: ‘Ortiz was one of the pre-eminent collectors of his day’.

We recall the associations with Ortiz such as the Horiuchi sarcophagus, the Hestiaios stele fragment, the marble funerary lekythos, and the Castor and Pollux.

Bernheimer will, no doubt, wish to reflect on the Royal Academy exhibition by reading Christopher Chippindale and David W. J. Gill. 2000. "Material consequences of contemporary classical collecting." American Journal of Archaeology 104: 463-511 [JSTOR].

Bernheimer will probably want to re-read the two pieces by Peter Watson that appeared in The Times: , "Ancient art without a history" and "Fakes - the artifice b…

Tutankhamun, Christie's and rigorous due dligence

It was announced today that the Egyptian authorities would be taking legal action against Christie's over the sale of the head of Tutankhamun ("Egypt to sue Christie's to retrieve £4.7m Tutankhamun bust", BBC News 9 July 2019).

The BBC reports:
Egypt's former antiquities chief, Zahi Hawass, said the bust appeared to have been "stolen" in the 1970s from the Temple of Karnak. "The owners have given false information," he told AFP news agency. "They have not shown any legal papers to prove its ownership." Christie's maintain the history of the piece as follows:
It stated that Germany's Prince Wilhelm von Thurn und Taxis reputedly had it in his collection by the 1960s, and that it was acquired by an Austrian dealer in 1973-4. However the family of von Thurn und Taxis claim that the head was never in that collection [see here].

Christie's reject any hint of criticism:
"Christie's would not and do not sell any work whe…