Skip to main content

Lord Owen on the Parthenon Marbles

Lord Owen has written a letter to The Times (June 15, 2009) about the Hellenic Ministry of Culture's rejection of the offer of a loan of the Parthenon sculptures presently residing in the British Museum. The letter comments:
The only way that the Elgin Marbles can make periodic visits to the new Acropolis Museum, which is highly desirable, is if there is an EU cultural treaty couched in general terms allowing for the transfer of antiquities between the museums of member states in a way that guarantees, under international law, all aspects of their movement. In this way the EU would be demonstrating that it is a unique international organisation capable of ensuring the cultural heritage of its citizens without establishing precedents that could lead to the return to their country of origin of many objets d’art which enrich the museums of the EU member states.
For the full letter click here.

Comments

DR.KWAME OPOKU said…
The letter of Lord Owen is remarkable in many ways but above all, in the way it reveals residual racial and nationalistic attitudes among some members of the British ruling classes.

The noble Lord writes as if the United Nations and UNESCO did not exist and fails to take into account the mechanisms that exist for resolving such cultural disputes, provided the parties are ready to act in good faith.

Owen seeks to elevate a bilateral problem into a general problem. A dispute between Britain and Greece is turned into a general International Law question but this generalization is immediately limited and turned into a European Union problem. The fear of the noble Lord is that a precedent could be set for returning stolen/looted cultural objects and might enable others outside the European Union to seek the repatriation of their looted cultural artefacts. The Africans and the Asians might be knocking at the door of the British Museum for the return of thousands of cultural objects, including the Benin bronzes,
that were stolen in the colonial period.

Lord Owen’s solution is to have: “EU cultural treaty couched in general terms allowing for the transfer of antiquities between the museums of member states in a way that guarantees, under international law, all aspects of their movement”. This would enable the parties to do whatever they agree on. Maybe Lord Owen should be informed that the United Kingdom and Greece have been discussing this matter within the frame work of UNESCO without any result owing to the intransigent attitude of Britain, primarily supporting the position of the British Museum in a matter where British Parliamentarians should take an independent view of the issue so as to reflect the view of the overwhelming majority of British people who are in favour of returning the Parthenon/Elgin Marbles.

A solution to the issue of the Parthenon/Elgin Marbles which is other than bilateral but at the same time seeks to limit its generalization to the European Union is clearly a reflection of a way of thinking that will disappoint all those who truly believe in International Law, the United Nations and UNESCO.

Dr.Kwame Opoku

Popular posts from this blog

Marble bull's head from the temple of Eshmun

Excavations at the temple of Eshmun in Lebanon recovered a marble bull's head. It is now suggested that it was this head, apparently first published in 1967, that was placed on loan to New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art (Tom Mashberg, "Met Museum Turns Over Another Relic With Disputed Past to Prosecutors", New York Times August 1, 2017 ). The head is reported to have been handed over to the Manhattan district attorney after a request was received from the Lebanese authorities.

It is suggested that the head may have been looted from an archaeological storage area at Byblos in the 1980s during the Lebanese civil war. Mashberg has rehearsed the recent collecting history:
The owners of the bull’s head, Lynda and William Beierwaltes of Colorado, say they have clear title to the item and have sued Manhattan prosecutors for its return.  The Beierwaltes bought the head from a dealer in London in 1996 for more than $1 million and then sold it to another collector, Michael …

The Toledo skyphos and a Swiss private collection

The Attic red-figured skyphos attributed to the Kleophon painter in the Toledo Museum of Art (inv. 1982.88) is now coming under further scrutiny following the research of Dr Christos Tsirogiannis. The skyphos shows Hephaistos returning to Olympos.

Tsirogiannis has identified what appears to be this skyphos in five photographs in the Medici Dossier. The museum acknowledged that the skyphos had resided in a 'private Swiss collection'. Tsirogiannis suggests that this is probably a reference to Medici.

Enquiries to the museum by Tsirogiannis elicited the information that the skyphos had been acquired from Nicholas Koutoulakis (although that information does not appear on the museum's online catalogue).

The curatorial team at the Toledo Museum of Art will, no doubt, be contacting the Italian authorities to discuss the future residence of the skyphos.

For further discussion of the Toledo Museum of Art on LM see here.

Reference
Tsirogiannis, C. 2017. "Nekyia: Museum ethics an…

Metropolitan Museum of Art hands over Paestan krater

In May 2014 I commented on a Paestan krater acquired by New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art after it had been identified by Dr Christos Tsirogiannis in photographic images seized from Giacomo Medici. Tsirogiannis published his full concerns in the Journal of Art Crime in 2014, but it has taken a further three years for the museum to respond.

The krater showing Dionysos in a hand-drawn cart was purchased in 1989 from the Bothmer Purchase Fund (details from the Museum's website, inv. 1989.11.4). The krater surfaced through Sotheby's New York in June 1989.

It is unclear who consigned the krater to Sotheby's New York.

It has now been revealed that the krater has been handed over to the US authorities after a warrant had been issued (Tom Mashberg, "Ancient Vase Seized From Met Museum on Suspicion It Was Looted", New York Times July 31, 2018).

It appears that the museum did make an attempt to resolve the case in December 2016. Mashberg notes:
The Met, for its par…