Why are AAMD members reluctant to disclose collecting histories? Why do they send out a signal that they have something to hide?
Monday, 26 October 2009
Opaque transparency
Nearly a year ago I commented on the AAMD's "commitment" to transparency over the acquisition of archaeological material. One year on I have yet to receive the information that I requested from two (AAMD member) museums about four items that have been acquired since 2002. (Note: these are very recent acquisitions.)
Why are AAMD members reluctant to disclose collecting histories? Why do they send out a signal that they have something to hide?
Why are AAMD members reluctant to disclose collecting histories? Why do they send out a signal that they have something to hide?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Worcester Art Museum Returns Hecht-linked Pots to Italy
Photo: Worcester Art Museum The Worcester Art Museum has returned two Attic pots to Italy; they are now back on loan to the museum (" W...
-
Source: Sotheby's A marble head of Alexander the Great has been seized in New York (reported in " Judge Orders Return of Ancien... -
The Fire of Hephaistos exhibition included "seven bronzes ... that have been linked to the Bubon cache of imperial statues" (p. 1...
-
It appears that a bronze head acquired by the J. Paul Getty Museum from Nicolas Koutoulakis has been removed from display and appears to be...
No comments:
Post a Comment