Why are AAMD members reluctant to disclose collecting histories? Why do they send out a signal that they have something to hide?
Monday, 26 October 2009
Opaque transparency
Nearly a year ago I commented on the AAMD's "commitment" to transparency over the acquisition of archaeological material. One year on I have yet to receive the information that I requested from two (AAMD member) museums about four items that have been acquired since 2002. (Note: these are very recent acquisitions.)
Why are AAMD members reluctant to disclose collecting histories? Why do they send out a signal that they have something to hide?
Why are AAMD members reluctant to disclose collecting histories? Why do they send out a signal that they have something to hide?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Drawing attention to "provenance" at the Met
Courtesy of Christos Tsirogiannis One of largest group of repatriated material from New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art was dervied fr...
-
Source: Sotheby's A marble head of Alexander the Great has been seized in New York (reported in " Judge Orders Return of Ancien... -
Tarentine funerary relief Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art The Manhattan DA has provided limited details about the recent return of antiqu...
-
If international museums can no longer "own" antiquities either through purchase on the antiquities market or through partage , wh...
No comments:
Post a Comment