Why are AAMD members reluctant to disclose collecting histories? Why do they send out a signal that they have something to hide?
Monday, 26 October 2009
Opaque transparency
Nearly a year ago I commented on the AAMD's "commitment" to transparency over the acquisition of archaeological material. One year on I have yet to receive the information that I requested from two (AAMD member) museums about four items that have been acquired since 2002. (Note: these are very recent acquisitions.)
Why are AAMD members reluctant to disclose collecting histories? Why do they send out a signal that they have something to hide?
Why are AAMD members reluctant to disclose collecting histories? Why do they send out a signal that they have something to hide?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Further returns to Italy from the MMA
Formerly New York MMA 1991.11.6.1–2. Source: MMA New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art has returned another batch of Greek and Roman ant...
-
Source: Sotheby's A marble head of Alexander the Great has been seized in New York (reported in " Judge Orders Return of Ancien... -
Tarentine funerary relief Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art The Manhattan DA has provided limited details about the recent return of antiqu...
-
If international museums can no longer "own" antiquities either through purchase on the antiquities market or through partage , wh...
No comments:
Post a Comment