Skip to main content

ACCG Charity Donor Charged

In September 2010 Paul Barford raised some questions about the donors behind the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild (ACCG) Third Benefit Auction.

The auction purpose was stated:
The previous two ACCG Benefits Auctions have raised more than $80,000 to support the continuing rights of ancient coin collectors and businesses, everywhere, to pursue their interests.

The ACCG consists of collectors and numismatic professionals who care passionately about preserving, studying and displaying ancient coins from all cultures.

One of the key donors to the 2010 Auction was Holyland Numismatics (see e.g. here). Yesterday Salem Alshdaifat, the owner of Hoyland Numismatics, was one of several people charged.

It is a matter of record that the ACCG has been challenging US import restrictions (see here).

Yesterday's development suggests that there may indeed be some interesting pursuits of interest to emerge from this latest case.

Bookmark and Share so Your Real Friends Know that You Know


Wayne G. Sayles said…
For this they gave you an award? I expected no less from Paul Barford, but David I harbored some small hope that you were cut from a bit different cloth. The situation is sad enough, for all of us, you didn't need to inflame it and beg for retribution. There are more than 750 members of the ACCG and something less than 100 of them are dealers. Many dealers and collectors have donated objects to past ACCG benefit auctions. Holyland Numismatics was among them in 2010. That firm was not, as you state, "a key donor". As you well know, the records of this case were sealed and ACCG was not at that time aware of any charges pending, nor of any history of investigations in progress. I would hope that you would rethink your position and focus on the case at hand, not on tarring everybody who ever breathed air in the same room as those charged. We should all remember that charges are one think and convictions are another. I have faith in the American legal system and will hope, whatever the outcome, that justice prevails.
David Gill said…
Dear Wayne
The association may be 'sad enough', indeed unfortunate, but it is there. We will, of course, see the outcome of the due legal process.
With best wishes
Anonymous said…
Holyland Numismatics, Salim Alshadaifat's business is also listed as a financial supporter of the ACCG, a "patron".

I'm sure that they will change that list soon, but it can no doubt found in the Google cache for a few days.

One would think that when accepting items for a benefit auction, the charity would at least conduct some basic due diligence as to the business practices of the donor in question.

It is clear from the VCoins site of the dealer that he dealt (deals?) in middle eastern material in vast quantities, earth-encrusted (i.e. recently discovered) and had even indicated on his website he was importing things via Dubai.
kyri said…
you will allways get a few rotten apples in a barrel,unfortunately it is the the trade as a whole which is tarnishd by dealers like this.there are alot of decent, hard working, honest dealers out there who are probably as dismayed as i am about these activities so to condemn the ACCG as being guilty by association is a bit unfair
Paul Barford said…
Two words for Wayne, "Casey Anthony". We all saw.

Kyri, apart from the question where they came from and the lack of information regarding that in the sales offers, where do you think the "dealers lots" went? Do you think just three black sheep dealers bought the lot, or do you think that quite a few dealers bought them, not really knowing - or caring - how they came to be on sale where they were?

When you have a few rotten apples in the barrel, unless you throw them out pretty sharply, before long you have a barrel of rotting apples. How much throwing out does the antiquities (in which I include the ancient coin) trade do?

Which brings us back to the question of the due diligence the advocacy group for coin collectors did over the offers of material for their showpiece benefit auctions and who they accept as their patrons.

Perfectly valid questions.
Wayne G. Sayles said…
Dear a4bbbb20-aef6-11e0-88f1-000bcdcb5194;

The criteria for ACCG Patron membership is clearly spelled out on the guild website ( Salem Alshdaifat is a Patron member of the ACCG and has pleaded not guilty to the charges brought against him. He will remain a Patron member unless he is found guilty of those charges or the Board of Directors finds cause to revoke his membership. There's no need to check Google Cache, we don't work that way.

I might add that the ACCG has ALWAYS opposed illicit activity and has done so vocally. The ACCG opposition to import restrictions is motivated by and based on the effect that such restrictions have on the licit market. To suggest (as some have done) that ACCG supports illicit activity because it opposes import restrictions on ancient coins is outlandishly ignorant.

Wayne G. Sayles
Executive Director, ACCG
Anonymous said…
Dear Mister Sells,

If you vociferously oppose all kinds of illicit and unethical activity, why don't you take a look at the business practices of those who provide financial support to your organization? You argue the coin trade is clean and not supplied much by people like the individual in question.

Last year Paul Barford was able to tell there was a problem with the way this seller obtained material just by looking at his website! But you happily take donations and financial support from visible dealers without thinking of their business practices! You're either foolish, careless, or just don't care.

This is the problem; dealers don't want to clean house and don't want to bear any responsibility to be diligent. It's as much your problem for not maintaining a standard as it is his for not having any ethical scruples

Yours truly,
Wayne G. Sayles said…
Dear a4bbbb20-aef6-11e0-88f1-000bcdcb5194;

If I list here a few members of the archaeological/anthropological profession who have been prosecuted for cultural property law violations, will you criticize the organizations they belong to for not being more diligent?

BTW, why are you afraid to stand in the sunshine?
Paul Barford said…
Mr Sayles,
I would. My whole blog is as much an indictment of UK archaeologists as the metal detectorists they support.

But I cannot speak for a4bbbb20-aef6-11e0-88f1-000bcdcb5194 of course.
Paul Barford said…
Mr Sayles stated that Holyland numismatics would remain an ACCG member unless found guilty. It seems not:

What happened to "innocent until proven guilty"? Why is the ACCG not standing by its members here?

Popular posts from this blog

Marble bull's head from the temple of Eshmun

Excavations at the temple of Eshmun in Lebanon recovered a marble bull's head. It is now suggested that it was this head, apparently first published in 1967, that was placed on loan to New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art (Tom Mashberg, "Met Museum Turns Over Another Relic With Disputed Past to Prosecutors", New York Times August 1, 2017 ). The head is reported to have been handed over to the Manhattan district attorney after a request was received from the Lebanese authorities.

It is suggested that the head may have been looted from an archaeological storage area at Byblos in the 1980s during the Lebanese civil war. Mashberg has rehearsed the recent collecting history:
The owners of the bull’s head, Lynda and William Beierwaltes of Colorado, say they have clear title to the item and have sued Manhattan prosecutors for its return.  The Beierwaltes bought the head from a dealer in London in 1996 for more than $1 million and then sold it to another collector, Michael …

The Getty Kouros: "The moral is, never ever buy a piece without a provenance"

In the wake of the 1992 Athens conference to discuss the Getty kouros (85.AA.40), one of the delegates, a "distinguished" American museum curator, was quoted ("Greek sculpture; the age-old question", The Economist June 20, 1992):
The moral is, never ever buy a piece without a provenance.
The recent discussions about the return of antiquities from North American museums to Italy and Greece may seem far removed from the acquisition of what appears to be a forged archaic Greek sculpture in the 1980s. However, there are some surprising overlaps.

The statue arrived at the Getty on September 18, 1983 in seven pieces. True (1993: 11) subsequently asked two questions:
Where was it found? As it was said to have been in a Swiss private collection for fifty years, why had it never been reassembled, though it was virtually complete?
A similar statue surfacing in the 1930s
A decision was taken to acquire the kouros in 1985. The official Getty line at the time (and reported in Russell…

The Getty kouros: a modern creation?

The refurbished galleries of the J. Paul Getty Museum no longer include the Getty kouros, a sculpture purchased in 1985 (Christopher Knight, "Something's missing from the newly reinstalled antiquities collection at the Getty Villa", LA Times April 19, 2018). Knight explains:
Unexpectedly, the Getty kouros, a controversial sculpture even before the museum acquired it more than 30 years ago, has been removed from public view. The work is now in museum storage.   For decades, the life-size carving of a standing nude youth carried one of the most distinctive labels of any work of art in an American museum: “Greece (?) about 530 B.C. or modern forgery.” The label encapsulated puzzling issues about the work, whose questionable status as dating from the archaic dawn of Western civilization had been the focus of scholarly and scientific research, debate and international symposiums for years. It is ten years since I provided an overview of the kouros here on LM. And over 20 year…