Skip to main content

Antiquities seized in northern Greece

The Greek press has reported that a number of antiquities have been seized in Macedonia, northern Greece (ANSA October 10, 2011). Two Greek nationals were detained during the operation. The 120 or so objects included "four helmets, golden masks, golden rings, sword fragments and other objects". The finds are reported as being similar to those found in the sixth century BCE cemetery at Sindos.

It was suggested that the two individuals were about to sell the pieces to collectors outside Greece. The report also hinted that objects with "good" recording histories are in such short supply that newly surfaced antiquities are required to top up the depleted "reserves".


  • Report from BBC: "Greek police seize 'smuggled' ancient treasure" (October 7, 2011)


Bookmark and Share so Your Real Friends Know that You Know

Comments

kyri said…
i have seen the press photos of the helmets,they are illyrian helmets variant 111 type ,exactly the same as the ones found at sindos,6th cen BC.the gold masks are nothing like the one published by the bbc which was found by schliemann.a good catch by the greek police in these troubled times.
ps;i dont know why you have to be so politically corect david,do all academics have to use bce instead of bc now.
kyri.
David Gill said…
Dear Kyri
Yes, the Illyrian helmets do appear to be similar to those found at Sindos. But remember that this style is also found in tombs in FYROM, for example, with the Koreshnica krater. Sindos also has a number of gold "masks" associated with the helmets. (There is an excellent catalogue of the finds.)
There has been much tweeting of late about BC / BCE and AD / CE. I have adopted the housestyle of several academic journals and used BCE / CE. My personal preference would be to use BC / AD.
And thank you for reminding us of the problem of "stock" photographs used by news agencies.
Best wishes
David
Paul Barford said…
Changing the subject (sorry)... David, I really object to this BCE nonsense, WHOSE "common era" is it supposed to be? Moslems too? Its not "common" at all, just common to all those that date things using a calendar relative to the supposed date of the birth of Christ whether or not he is seen as the Incarnation of God. What is the difference between AD and AUC or AH? The common era of various other cultures begins with a different "year 0". I really do not see the problem with using "BC" in the context of Western culture. The PC mob will be wanting us to change the names of the days and months soon and the names of past NASA space rocket series (most named after pagan gods). Rant over.
Anonymous said…
David,

Please make sure your readers learn about the new proposals for Bulgaria and Belize:

http://exchanges.state.gov/media/office-of-policy-and-evaluation/chc/pdfs/2011frnbzbgcpac.pdf

Avatar

Popular posts from this blog

The Getty Kouros: "The moral is, never ever buy a piece without a provenance"

In the wake of the 1992 Athens conference to discuss the Getty kouros (85.AA.40), one of the delegates, a "distinguished" American museum curator, was quoted ("Greek sculpture; the age-old question", The Economist June 20, 1992):
The moral is, never ever buy a piece without a provenance.
The recent discussions about the return of antiquities from North American museums to Italy and Greece may seem far removed from the acquisition of what appears to be a forged archaic Greek sculpture in the 1980s. However, there are some surprising overlaps.

The statue arrived at the Getty on September 18, 1983 in seven pieces. True (1993: 11) subsequently asked two questions:
Where was it found? As it was said to have been in a Swiss private collection for fifty years, why had it never been reassembled, though it was virtually complete?
A similar statue surfacing in the 1930s
A decision was taken to acquire the kouros in 1985. The official Getty line at the time (and reported in Russell…

Symes and a Roman medical set

Pierre Bergé & Associés of Paris are offering a rare Roman bronze medical set (16 May 2018, lot 236). Its recorded history is: "Ancienne collection Hishiguro, Tokyo, 1992". The catalogue entry helpfully informs us that the set probably came from a burial ("Cette trousse de chirurgien a probablement été découverte dans une sépulture ...").

The set appears to be the one that has been identified by Dr Christos Tsirogannis from an image in the Schinousa archive thus linking it to Robin Symes.

Given that the catalogue entry suggests that this piece came from a funerary context and that the history of the piece can only be traced back to 1992 (and not to 1970), questions are being raised about the set's origins.

What due diligence was conducted on the medical set prior to offering it for sale? Did Symes sell the set to Hishiguro? How did Symes obtain the set? Who sold it to him?

I understand that the appropriate authorities in France are being informed about the …

The Minoan Larnax and the Michael C. Carlos Museum

I was recently asked to comment on the acquisition of recently surfaced antiquities in Greece as part of an interview. One of the examples I gave was the Minoan larnax that was acquired by the Michael C. Carlos Museum. Although this piece has been discussed in the Greek press, the museum has not yet responded to the apparent identification in the Becchina archive.

Is the time now right for the Michael C. Carlos Museum or the wider authorities at Emory University to negotiate the return of this impressive piece so that it can be placed on display in a museum in Greece?