Skip to main content

The Schinoussa Archive and Italian Antiquities

Terracotta heads from the Schinoussa Archive
The Schinoussa Archive is proving to be raising interesting questions about antiquities that are surfacing on the market. This pair of Greek terracottas look remarkably similar to a pair (once in a London "private collection") that passed into a North American private collection and are due to be auctioned at Christie's in London on 6 October 2011 (lot 69). Are they the same? Will Christie's reveal the identity of the London private collection? What had the due diligence search revealed?

Bonhams withdrew three ex-Symes Roman statues when their collecting histories became known. What will Christie's do in this case? Will they contact the Italian cultural attaché at the London embassy?

The Minneapolis Institute of Arts has announced that it will be returning a krater that it had acquired from Symes (or should that be a "London collector"?).

Potential buyers of antiquities need to be reassured that their purchases will not cause them problems in the future.

Bookmark and Share so Your Real Friends Know that You Know


Anonymous said…
This is disgusting, David. Why will Christie's not learn from past mistakes? Who was the private collector who owned these objects in the US between 1999 and 2011? Where are the two Terracotta heads until Friday? Through which US Customs Control will they be able to go, through which UK border enter without proper documentation?

On a related note, why does Lot 29, which has no provenance before 1987 be allowed to go on sale, when the UK abides to the UNESCO Laws since 2002?

Since we all love Cycladic figurines and they will hit it again at Christies (Gabrielle Keiler Collection) my somewhat related question goes: Our dear Badisches Landesmuseum Karlsruhe needed a show for December:
It is probably they have so many of these figurines but they can only display them if they have learned from 1976. Guess what? Colin Renfrew will speak. So I assume there is a balance there in the exhibition and I look forward to a proper analysis of the catalogue once it is published.
Seems hard to believe these are not the same pieces. What's the usual policy on reporting repairs? Would that be in the full catalogue entry or rely on bidder's examination?
For those still wondering if the pair of Greek terracottas to be auctioned by Christie’s on October 6th, 2011, are the same as those of the Schinoussa Archive, please refer to the condition report of lot 69, provided by Christie’s. You couldn’t find a more accurate and detailed description of the terracottas initial state (before being repaired) as this has been captured on the Schinoussa Archived photo!!!
Anonymous said…
Thanks, Emmanuel! Translates to: the person who made the restorations is clearly not belonging to a professional team that has an ethics code. Why the heck is Christie's just so stupid and put their business at such a risk?
David Gill said…
Does the discussion of conservation recall a certain helmet auctioned at the same London auction house?
Paul Barford said…
I note the report only refers to the paint being "worn". if you compare what Christies are offering with the objects' condition in the Schinoussa archive it seems some paint has been removed (I think removed rather than lost) and some added in areas where there was none - like over the triangular restoration on the neck.

This is not an accurate statement of either "condition" or recent treatment. And yes, the brutal and equally poorly documented prettyfying treatment the Crosby G. helmet received at the hands of a restorer commissioned by Christies comes to mind.

Profit uber alles, I'd say.
Anonymous said…

Check out Greek's most recent request from the Karlsruhe Museum:

Popular posts from this blog

Codename: Ainsbrook

I have been watching (UK) Channel 4's Time Team this evening. The programme looked at an undisclosed field (under a potato crop) where a Viking burial had been found. The location in Yorkshire was so sensitive that it was given a codename: Ainsbrook. Here is the summary:
In late 2003 two metal detectorists were working in a field in Yorkshire. They found 'treasure' buried just beneath the surface – a collection of Viking material next to a body. Although they had been detecting on the site for a number of years, during which time they had made large numbers of finds, nothing they had uncovered previously compared with this. They decided to share their discovery with archaeologists.The programme explored the tension between metal-detectorists and the English Heritage sponsored archaeologists putting six trenches into the field based on a geo-physical survey. Finds made by the metal-detectorists did not easily map onto the archaeological features.

Part of the programme had an …

Stele returns to Greece

The Hellenic Ministry of Culture has announced (Saturday 8 September 2018) that a stele that had been due to be auctioned at Sotheby's in London in June 2017 has been returned to Greece (Friday 7 September 2018). The identification had been made by Cambridge-based forensic archaeologist Dr Christos Tsirogiannis.

It appeared that the stele had been supplied with a falsified history as its presence with Becchina until 1990 contradicted the published sale catalogue entry. It then moved into the hands of George Ortiz.

A year ago it was suggested that Sotheby's should contact the Greek authorities. Those negotiations appear to have concluded successfully.

The 4th century BC stele fragment, with the personal name, Hestiaios, will be displayed in the Epigraphic Museum in Athens. It appears to have come from a cemetery in Attica.

The scale of the returns to Italy

I have been busy working on an overview, "Returning Archaeological Objects to Italy". The scale of the returns to Italy from North American collections and galleries is staggering: in excess of 350 objects. This is clearly the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the material that has surfaced on the market without a history that can be traced back to the period before 1970. 

I will provide more information in due course, but the researcher is a reminder that we need to take due diligence seriously when it comes to making acquisitions.