Skip to main content

Cyprus: Further Looting

Is it a "coincidence" that as the officers of the ACCG (Wayne Sayles, Executive Director, August 6, 2008; Peter Tompa, President, August 9; August 16, 2008; see also David Welsh, member of the ACCG Board, and Chairman of the International Affairs Committee, July 11, August 10, August 20, 2008; and see earlier reactions) launch what appear to be co-ordinated attacks on those connected with the Cyprus American Archaeological Research Institute (CAARI) and archaeologists commenting on the ethics of collecting, there are reports of looting in the Kourris Valley near Limassol? (See Anna Hassapi, "Tomb raiders plundering Kourris Valley antiquities", Cyprus Mail August 19, 2008).

Dr Pavlos Flourentzos, the Director of the Antiquities Department, is quoted:
The illegal antiquities trade is a problem in Cyprus, even in the non-occupied part ... However, there are antiquities buried in the ground almost everywhere in Cyprus. Therefore, tomb raiding and illegal antiquities trading is a problem in many other areas, not just in the Kourris Valley. When citizens break the law and steal, it is a matter for the police and I think they have been doing a good job.
Such reports remind us of the need for import restrictions on archaeological material from Cyprus.

Comments

Eubolos said…
Looting is indeed a problem everywhere in Cyprus (North and South), though nowadays, most of the material seems not to enter the open market anymore and not to end up with dealers and auction houses in London, Munich and Switzerland. Instead, the "finds" seem to find a quick way to collectors on the island.

We did a survey of the published collections here in Cyprus (Severis, Giabra Pierides & Zintilis, all formed after 1960)according to the methods applied by Chippendale and Gill to Cycladic figurines, and we found that 98.4% of the objects in the Severis-Coll., 98.6% in the Giabra-Pierides and 37.7% in the Zintilis-Coll. have no provenance or previous owner at all. Of the 784 objects in the Zintilis collection, 29 had so-called "find spots" in Northern Cyprus while 271 had one in the South (Republic of Cyprus). It would be helpful, if those who deplore the looting in Cyprus would also indicate its consequences to the privileged few who can afford to have their collections published... There is, as always, a lot of hypocrisy around.

Marc Fehlmann
Department of Archaeology and Art History
Faculty of Arts and Sciences
EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN UNIVERSITY
Famagusta, Northern Cyprus
http://brahms.emu.edu.tr/Beta/department.php?id=479
David Gill said…
Marc
Thank you for these comments. This group of private collectors is very interesting.
Best wishes
David
Wayne G. Sayles said…
Thank you Dr. Fehlman for having the intestinal fortitude to state publicly the truth of the situation. If a U.S. collector said the same thing, it would immediately be brushed off (and has been) as self-serving rhetoric. Regarding coins, which is the only area of concern to me personally, extremely few coins from Cyprus appear on the U.S. market and many if not most of them are from well known old collections.
David Gill said…
The Thanos N. Zintilis collection of Cypriot antiquities is in the Museum of Cycladic Art in Athens. [See catalogue]

For the Pierides collection: catalogue.

For the Severis collection: V. Karageorghis, Ancient Cypriote Art in the Severis Collection (Nicosia 1999) [review in BASOR]
samarkeolog said…
I wish I could remember it - I'm sure I took a photo of the display board - but the Zintilis exhibition in Athens had a wonderful turn of phrase when explaining to visitors how he had collected his material and when. Maybe, "Zintilis collected most of his antiquities at a time when the law was more relaxed", something like that.

The silent accord and amnesty allowed Greek Cypriot collectors who had access to the Turkish Cypriot enclaves to buy looted antiquities for private collections. Antiquities Director Vassos Karageorghis explained in his memoirs that he himself used to buy looted antiquities for the (public) Cyprus Museum with government money (Karageorghis, 2007: 102-103). A minor problem that he didn't tarry on was that the enclaves were controlled by the Turkish Cypriot terrorist group TMT. So, some of the money for the looted antiquities would have gone to TMT, and some of the money for smuggling them out of the enclaves would have gone to TMT too. (Karageorghis didn't have that last worry - he entered and exited the enclaves in a UNESCO vehicle...)

Karageorghis, V. 2007: A lifetime in the archaeology of Cyprus. Stockholm: Medelhavsmuseet.
samarkeolog said…
Although Marc Fehlmann's point about the origins of the collections themselves is entirely valid, I would note that if the collections were largely formed between 1963 and 1974, the north/south spread of the find-spots would be irrelevant, because the two regions hadn't been segregated yet. (But if many of the artefacts appeared in the collections through post-1974 amnesties on looted antiquities, he would have a valid point about the geographical spread, too.)

Popular posts from this blog

Codename: Ainsbrook

I have been watching (UK) Channel 4's Time Team this evening. The programme looked at an undisclosed field (under a potato crop) where a Viking burial had been found. The location in Yorkshire was so sensitive that it was given a codename: Ainsbrook. Here is the summary:
In late 2003 two metal detectorists were working in a field in Yorkshire. They found 'treasure' buried just beneath the surface – a collection of Viking material next to a body. Although they had been detecting on the site for a number of years, during which time they had made large numbers of finds, nothing they had uncovered previously compared with this. They decided to share their discovery with archaeologists.The programme explored the tension between metal-detectorists and the English Heritage sponsored archaeologists putting six trenches into the field based on a geo-physical survey. Finds made by the metal-detectorists did not easily map onto the archaeological features.

Part of the programme had an …

The scale of the returns to Italy

I have been busy working on an overview, "Returning Archaeological Objects to Italy". The scale of the returns to Italy from North American collections and galleries is staggering: in excess of 350 objects. This is clearly the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the material that has surfaced on the market without a history that can be traced back to the period before 1970. 

I will provide more information in due course, but the researcher is a reminder that we need to take due diligence seriously when it comes to making acquisitions.

Stele returns to Greece

The Hellenic Ministry of Culture has announced (Saturday 8 September 2018) that a stele that had been due to be auctioned at Sotheby's in London in June 2017 has been returned to Greece (Friday 7 September 2018). The identification had been made by Cambridge-based forensic archaeologist Dr Christos Tsirogiannis.

It appeared that the stele had been supplied with a falsified history as its presence with Becchina until 1990 contradicted the published sale catalogue entry. It then moved into the hands of George Ortiz.

A year ago it was suggested that Sotheby's should contact the Greek authorities. Those negotiations appear to have concluded successfully.

The 4th century BC stele fragment, with the personal name, Hestiaios, will be displayed in the Epigraphic Museum in Athens. It appears to have come from a cemetery in Attica.