Skip to main content

Cyprus: pots and coins

There has been a reminder of the scale of looting on Cyprus. There is a report by Menelaos Hadjicostis on the breaking up of a major "smuggling ring" ("Cyprus police bust large antiquities theft ring", AP January 25, 2010). The raid found pottery and limestone sculptures as well as silver and bronze coins valued at 11 million Euros. Ten Cypriot nationals were arrested and five others, including a Syrian national, were on the run. The antiquities are reported to have been found in the region of Limassol and Paphos.

A seizure like this is a good reminder of the need for agreements to protect the finite cultural resources of Cyprus. This includes the MOU between Cyprus and the United States. The presence of coins in the haul shows that coins need to be part of any agreement. It also explains why coin dealers have been challenging the agreement.

Bookmark and Share so Your Real Friends Know that You Know


David- Once again, your logic is flawed. If anything, this proves that Cyprus has the police forces available to handle its looting problem internally without requiring American collectors and dealers importing coins to make an impossible provenance showing Cypriot collectors and others around the EU are not required to make.

And apparently US Customs is so busy with other pressing matters that after almost 10 months it has yet to get around to filing a forfeiture action against the unprovenanced Cypriot and Chinese coins the ACCG imported for purposes of a test case. Perhaps, under the circumstances, we should forget about expanding import restrictions further and allow the Cypriots, Chinese, Italians etc. take care of their own problems.


Peter Tompa
Flawed logic? The logic espoused in the comment above is that if the police are adept at enforcing laws, then those laws are not necessary. Is this not in itself contradictory? If police arrest people involved in the sale of stolen auto parts, then do we not need laws against trading in stolen goods? Or might one steal a car to "test" the validity of that law?

In fact, the MOU explicitly calls for further enforcement on the ground in Cyprus and the press release discussed here relays, in part, the successes of that agreement.
Nathan, the statutory history of the CPIA indicates that import restrictions were only supposed to be a temporary expedient to allow the source country time to ramp up its enforcement efforts.

Cyprus is a wealthy EU country and has the financial means to do this. I recognize the Cypriots say they cannot control what goes on in the Turkish side of the Island, but then again most commentators put the blame for the continuance of that sad situation squarely on the Greek Cypriots.

Finally, if Cyprus is truly interested in protecting its archaeological sites as opposed to pressing its nationalistic claims, why are the restrictions phrased as being on "coins of Cypriot type" as opposed to any coins traced back to Cyprus?

Best wishes,

Peter Tompa

I honestly do not know what the answer to your final question is, but Isn't an obvious solution that it closes the loophole of "coins of a Cypriot type" that the possessor claims are not from Cyprus?

Popular posts from this blog

Codename: Ainsbrook

I have been watching (UK) Channel 4's Time Team this evening. The programme looked at an undisclosed field (under a potato crop) where a Viking burial had been found. The location in Yorkshire was so sensitive that it was given a codename: Ainsbrook. Here is the summary:
In late 2003 two metal detectorists were working in a field in Yorkshire. They found 'treasure' buried just beneath the surface – a collection of Viking material next to a body. Although they had been detecting on the site for a number of years, during which time they had made large numbers of finds, nothing they had uncovered previously compared with this. They decided to share their discovery with archaeologists.The programme explored the tension between metal-detectorists and the English Heritage sponsored archaeologists putting six trenches into the field based on a geo-physical survey. Finds made by the metal-detectorists did not easily map onto the archaeological features.

Part of the programme had an …

The scale of the returns to Italy

I have been busy working on an overview, "Returning Archaeological Objects to Italy". The scale of the returns to Italy from North American collections and galleries is staggering: in excess of 350 objects. This is clearly the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the material that has surfaced on the market without a history that can be traced back to the period before 1970. 

I will provide more information in due course, but the researcher is a reminder that we need to take due diligence seriously when it comes to making acquisitions.

Stele returns to Greece

The Hellenic Ministry of Culture has announced (Saturday 8 September 2018) that a stele that had been due to be auctioned at Sotheby's in London in June 2017 has been returned to Greece (Friday 7 September 2018). The identification had been made by Cambridge-based forensic archaeologist Dr Christos Tsirogiannis.

It appeared that the stele had been supplied with a falsified history as its presence with Becchina until 1990 contradicted the published sale catalogue entry. It then moved into the hands of George Ortiz.

A year ago it was suggested that Sotheby's should contact the Greek authorities. Those negotiations appear to have concluded successfully.

The 4th century BC stele fragment, with the personal name, Hestiaios, will be displayed in the Epigraphic Museum in Athens. It appears to have come from a cemetery in Attica.