Skip to main content

Universal access to the Parthenon sculptures

For as long as I can remember I have enjoyed visiting the British Museum and walking through the galleries. Even on a short visit to London I will often make a short detour to take in a new gallery or to revisit old 'friends'. And if I have wanted to take an image I could do so quite freely. There is an institutional commitment to universal access.

British scholarship has had a long association with the publication of the sculptures from the Athenian acropolis. Humfry Payne and Gerard Mackworth-Young [both directors of the British School at Athens] collaborated on the beautifully photographed Archaic Marble Sculpture from the Acropolis (1936).

The Aegeanet list has been reminded by Professor Olga Palagia (The University of Athens) that photography in the New Acropolis Museum is now forbidden. When this new museum opened in June 2009 photography was permitted. (See some excellent pictures here.)

The banning of photography on such a well documented collection could send out an unfortunate signal. It will send out a message of encouragement for those who speak about cultural retentionism. If the Parthenon marbles were returned from London to Athens, would access to them be severely restricted? Would members of the public or interested academics find it easier to study the sculptures in London or in Athens?

Is it time for those responsible for this new policy to revise it?

© David Gill, 2010

Bookmark and Share so Your Real Friends Know that You Know


Anonymous said…
I agree with this-- why not photograph things that are ultra-well published (the Moschophoros) ? It adds to the sacralizing atmosphere-- which only gives argument to the Cuno-style reasoning that this is all about "nationalism"
Mark said…
A key issue to address is why ban photography? After having worked in a private cultural institution one understands that photography rights can be utilized for copyright and other revenue generating ventures. However, can a national museum prevent its own citizens, from whom it derives most of their income via taxes, from photographing the institution's collection? Clearly, it raises numerous issues regarding ownership and it leads to museums monopolizing culture.
This is surely a wrong decision which must be reversed soon by our Greek friends. It not only gives ammunition to the retentionists in Bloomsbury but also works against the desire of the Greeks to have more visitors and tourists to the New Acropolis Museum which is the pride of Athens.

The retentionists in London can always argue that in the British Museum you can take as many photos as you like but in Athens this is not allowed. This works as a great support for those arguing that the British Museum enables more people to learn about the sculptures. It comes so soon after the Greeks have demolished the argument that there is no suitable museum in Athens for the Marbles. Whoever took that this decision has not carefully considered its implications for the whole debate on returning the Marbles to Greece.

One significant aspect of modern tourism is the pleasure of tourists to take photos of the places they visit. This helps them to remember the interesting places and objects they have seen and also to tell their friends and relatives about their experience. But if they cannot photograph the sculptures in the New Acropolis Museum, the joy of visiting the museum will be considerably reduced. Fancy going to Athens and taking pictures of all the sights you see except the Parthenon Marbles even though this may have been your primary motivation for visiting Athens.

How can we convey our full impressions to others at home if we are unable to take photos of the world-famous sculptures? How can we convince others that the Parthenon Marbles in London would be best seen in their reunification with the remaining Marbles in Athens if we are unable to show visually the missing parts in Athens? I thought the whole idea of the exposition of the Parthenon Marbles in the New Acropolis Museum was to show the missing parts which are at the moment kept in the British Museum. How can we forcefully convey this message in the absence of photos from the Marbles in Athens?

The decision banning photos in the new museum is, in a way, partial negation of the digital revolution which has enabled people to communicate their impressions by means of modern photography.

This unfortunate decision must surely be reviewed and reversed soon.

Kwame Opoku.
Anonymous said…
Obviously some cultural material is damaged by flash photography and unfortunately people don't know how to turn the flash off, hence reasonable photographic restrictions. In this case, it appears to be a simple enforcement of property rights. For as long as cultural material is treated as just another form of property, there's really nothing that can be said of these kinds of policies.

Popular posts from this blog

Marble bull's head from the temple of Eshmun

Excavations at the temple of Eshmun in Lebanon recovered a marble bull's head. It is now suggested that it was this head, apparently first published in 1967, that was placed on loan to New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art (Tom Mashberg, "Met Museum Turns Over Another Relic With Disputed Past to Prosecutors", New York Times August 1, 2017 ). The head is reported to have been handed over to the Manhattan district attorney after a request was received from the Lebanese authorities.

It is suggested that the head may have been looted from an archaeological storage area at Byblos in the 1980s during the Lebanese civil war. Mashberg has rehearsed the recent collecting history:
The owners of the bull’s head, Lynda and William Beierwaltes of Colorado, say they have clear title to the item and have sued Manhattan prosecutors for its return.  The Beierwaltes bought the head from a dealer in London in 1996 for more than $1 million and then sold it to another collector, Michael …

The Toledo skyphos and a Swiss private collection

The Attic red-figured skyphos attributed to the Kleophon painter in the Toledo Museum of Art (inv. 1982.88) is now coming under further scrutiny following the research of Dr Christos Tsirogiannis. The skyphos shows Hephaistos returning to Olympos.

Tsirogiannis has identified what appears to be this skyphos in five photographs in the Medici Dossier. The museum acknowledged that the skyphos had resided in a 'private Swiss collection'. Tsirogiannis suggests that this is probably a reference to Medici.

Enquiries to the museum by Tsirogiannis elicited the information that the skyphos had been acquired from Nicholas Koutoulakis (although that information does not appear on the museum's online catalogue).

The curatorial team at the Toledo Museum of Art will, no doubt, be contacting the Italian authorities to discuss the future residence of the skyphos.

For further discussion of the Toledo Museum of Art on LM see here.

Tsirogiannis, C. 2017. "Nekyia: Museum ethics an…

Metropolitan Museum of Art hands over Paestan krater

In May 2014 I commented on a Paestan krater acquired by New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art after it had been identified by Dr Christos Tsirogiannis in photographic images seized from Giacomo Medici. Tsirogiannis published his full concerns in the Journal of Art Crime in 2014, but it has taken a further three years for the museum to respond.

The krater showing Dionysos in a hand-drawn cart was purchased in 1989 from the Bothmer Purchase Fund (details from the Museum's website, inv. 1989.11.4). The krater surfaced through Sotheby's New York in June 1989.

It is unclear who consigned the krater to Sotheby's New York.

It has now been revealed that the krater has been handed over to the US authorities after a warrant had been issued (Tom Mashberg, "Ancient Vase Seized From Met Museum on Suspicion It Was Looted", New York Times July 31, 2018).

It appears that the museum did make an attempt to resolve the case in December 2016. Mashberg notes:
The Met, for its par…