Skip to main content

Universal access to the Parthenon sculptures

For as long as I can remember I have enjoyed visiting the British Museum and walking through the galleries. Even on a short visit to London I will often make a short detour to take in a new gallery or to revisit old 'friends'. And if I have wanted to take an image I could do so quite freely. There is an institutional commitment to universal access.

British scholarship has had a long association with the publication of the sculptures from the Athenian acropolis. Humfry Payne and Gerard Mackworth-Young [both directors of the British School at Athens] collaborated on the beautifully photographed Archaic Marble Sculpture from the Acropolis (1936).

The Aegeanet list has been reminded by Professor Olga Palagia (The University of Athens) that photography in the New Acropolis Museum is now forbidden. When this new museum opened in June 2009 photography was permitted. (See some excellent pictures here.)

The banning of photography on such a well documented collection could send out an unfortunate signal. It will send out a message of encouragement for those who speak about cultural retentionism. If the Parthenon marbles were returned from London to Athens, would access to them be severely restricted? Would members of the public or interested academics find it easier to study the sculptures in London or in Athens?

Is it time for those responsible for this new policy to revise it?

© David Gill, 2010

Bookmark and Share so Your Real Friends Know that You Know


Anonymous said…
I agree with this-- why not photograph things that are ultra-well published (the Moschophoros) ? It adds to the sacralizing atmosphere-- which only gives argument to the Cuno-style reasoning that this is all about "nationalism"
Mark said…
A key issue to address is why ban photography? After having worked in a private cultural institution one understands that photography rights can be utilized for copyright and other revenue generating ventures. However, can a national museum prevent its own citizens, from whom it derives most of their income via taxes, from photographing the institution's collection? Clearly, it raises numerous issues regarding ownership and it leads to museums monopolizing culture.
This is surely a wrong decision which must be reversed soon by our Greek friends. It not only gives ammunition to the retentionists in Bloomsbury but also works against the desire of the Greeks to have more visitors and tourists to the New Acropolis Museum which is the pride of Athens.

The retentionists in London can always argue that in the British Museum you can take as many photos as you like but in Athens this is not allowed. This works as a great support for those arguing that the British Museum enables more people to learn about the sculptures. It comes so soon after the Greeks have demolished the argument that there is no suitable museum in Athens for the Marbles. Whoever took that this decision has not carefully considered its implications for the whole debate on returning the Marbles to Greece.

One significant aspect of modern tourism is the pleasure of tourists to take photos of the places they visit. This helps them to remember the interesting places and objects they have seen and also to tell their friends and relatives about their experience. But if they cannot photograph the sculptures in the New Acropolis Museum, the joy of visiting the museum will be considerably reduced. Fancy going to Athens and taking pictures of all the sights you see except the Parthenon Marbles even though this may have been your primary motivation for visiting Athens.

How can we convey our full impressions to others at home if we are unable to take photos of the world-famous sculptures? How can we convince others that the Parthenon Marbles in London would be best seen in their reunification with the remaining Marbles in Athens if we are unable to show visually the missing parts in Athens? I thought the whole idea of the exposition of the Parthenon Marbles in the New Acropolis Museum was to show the missing parts which are at the moment kept in the British Museum. How can we forcefully convey this message in the absence of photos from the Marbles in Athens?

The decision banning photos in the new museum is, in a way, partial negation of the digital revolution which has enabled people to communicate their impressions by means of modern photography.

This unfortunate decision must surely be reviewed and reversed soon.

Kwame Opoku.
Anonymous said…
Obviously some cultural material is damaged by flash photography and unfortunately people don't know how to turn the flash off, hence reasonable photographic restrictions. In this case, it appears to be a simple enforcement of property rights. For as long as cultural material is treated as just another form of property, there's really nothing that can be said of these kinds of policies.

Popular posts from this blog

Codename: Ainsbrook

I have been watching (UK) Channel 4's Time Team this evening. The programme looked at an undisclosed field (under a potato crop) where a Viking burial had been found. The location in Yorkshire was so sensitive that it was given a codename: Ainsbrook. Here is the summary:
In late 2003 two metal detectorists were working in a field in Yorkshire. They found 'treasure' buried just beneath the surface – a collection of Viking material next to a body. Although they had been detecting on the site for a number of years, during which time they had made large numbers of finds, nothing they had uncovered previously compared with this. They decided to share their discovery with archaeologists.The programme explored the tension between metal-detectorists and the English Heritage sponsored archaeologists putting six trenches into the field based on a geo-physical survey. Finds made by the metal-detectorists did not easily map onto the archaeological features.

Part of the programme had an …

The scale of the returns to Italy

I have been busy working on an overview, "Returning Archaeological Objects to Italy". The scale of the returns to Italy from North American collections and galleries is staggering: in excess of 350 objects. This is clearly the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the material that has surfaced on the market without a history that can be traced back to the period before 1970. 

I will provide more information in due course, but the researcher is a reminder that we need to take due diligence seriously when it comes to making acquisitions.

Stele returns to Greece

The Hellenic Ministry of Culture has announced (Saturday 8 September 2018) that a stele that had been due to be auctioned at Sotheby's in London in June 2017 has been returned to Greece (Friday 7 September 2018). The identification had been made by Cambridge-based forensic archaeologist Dr Christos Tsirogiannis.

It appeared that the stele had been supplied with a falsified history as its presence with Becchina until 1990 contradicted the published sale catalogue entry. It then moved into the hands of George Ortiz.

A year ago it was suggested that Sotheby's should contact the Greek authorities. Those negotiations appear to have concluded successfully.

The 4th century BC stele fragment, with the personal name, Hestiaios, will be displayed in the Epigraphic Museum in Athens. It appears to have come from a cemetery in Attica.