Skip to main content

Stonehenge Visitor Centre

One of the casualties of the UK spending review is the cancellation of the proposed £25 million visitor centre at Stonehenge (BBC News, June 17, 2010; "Coalition government axes £2bn of projects", BBC News June 17, 2010). The plan for the visitor centre had been approved in 2007 and then then Prime Minister had endorsed the project in October 2009. The final approval for the project had been given on January 10, 2010.

English Heritage has made a statement today:
English Heritage is obviously extremely disappointed that the £10 million promised by Gordon Brown, then Prime Minister, in the House of Commons on 13 May, 2009, will not now be forthcoming. 
Stonehenge is a project of global significance. It is Britain’s premier World Heritage Site. It was a key feature in Britain’s bid for the London Olympics. Transforming the monument’s setting and the visitor experience is vital to Britain’s reputation, and to our tourism industry, especially in 2012 but also thereafter. 
This does not necessarily mean this is the end of the project. We will be discussing the withdrawal of Government financial support with the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. We will be making an announcement as to the future of the project after the English Heritage Commission meets on 30 June.
A video of the cancelled project can be found here.

Image
© David Gill, 2010.

Bookmark and Share so Your Real Friends Know that You Know

Comments

Jack said…
£25 million. Does it really cost that much to put up a shed with some nice furnishings? Priority should definitely go towards securing the future of this beautiful monument from private/foreign ownership.
David Gill said…
Jack
Thank you for this comment. The ownership of Stonehenge is not in question. The issue is the replacement and relocation of the present unsympathetic visitor facilities.
David
Jack said…
Thanks for the clarification, I would always support that any funds to sustain Stonehenge are invested, but of course, during these times cuts have to be made.

Out of interest, what would said visitor centre bring? I suppose jobs, education, exhibitions, stuff like that.
David Gill said…
Jack
The present visitor facilities are very restricted. The aim had been to restore the 'plain' environment around Stonehenge, e.g. removing the car park and local roads. Visitors would then approach the henge on foot (and there were to be facilities for those with mobility issues).
There is a fairly comprehensive website outlining what the visitor centre would have brought. See the original post above.
Best wishes
David
Jack said…
Thanks for the reply, I will look into the link that you suggested.
Garry Denke said…
Denton funding is inside Avenue banks so go withdraw it.
Commissioners are very anxious that every possible Avenue is pursued.
http://www.bdonline.co.uk/news/eh-persists-with-stonehenge-plan/5001944.article
Garry Denke said…
Denton funding is inside Avenue banks so go withdraw it.
Commissioners are very anxious that every possible Avenue is pursued.
http://www.bdonline.co.uk/news/eh-persists-with-stonehenge-plan/5001944.article

Garry Denke
Garry Denke said…
Denton Marshall

Corker funding is inside Avenue banks so go withdraw it.
Commissioners are very anxious that every possible Avenue is pursued.
http://www.bdonline.co.uk/news/eh-persists-with-stonehenge-plan/5001944.article

Garry Denke

Popular posts from this blog

Codename: Ainsbrook

I have been watching (UK) Channel 4's Time Team this evening. The programme looked at an undisclosed field (under a potato crop) where a Viking burial had been found. The location in Yorkshire was so sensitive that it was given a codename: Ainsbrook. Here is the summary:
In late 2003 two metal detectorists were working in a field in Yorkshire. They found 'treasure' buried just beneath the surface – a collection of Viking material next to a body. Although they had been detecting on the site for a number of years, during which time they had made large numbers of finds, nothing they had uncovered previously compared with this. They decided to share their discovery with archaeologists.The programme explored the tension between metal-detectorists and the English Heritage sponsored archaeologists putting six trenches into the field based on a geo-physical survey. Finds made by the metal-detectorists did not easily map onto the archaeological features.

Part of the programme had an …

The scale of the returns to Italy

I have been busy working on an overview, "Returning Archaeological Objects to Italy". The scale of the returns to Italy from North American collections and galleries is staggering: in excess of 350 objects. This is clearly the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the material that has surfaced on the market without a history that can be traced back to the period before 1970. 

I will provide more information in due course, but the researcher is a reminder that we need to take due diligence seriously when it comes to making acquisitions.

Stele returns to Greece

The Hellenic Ministry of Culture has announced (Saturday 8 September 2018) that a stele that had been due to be auctioned at Sotheby's in London in June 2017 has been returned to Greece (Friday 7 September 2018). The identification had been made by Cambridge-based forensic archaeologist Dr Christos Tsirogiannis.

It appeared that the stele had been supplied with a falsified history as its presence with Becchina until 1990 contradicted the published sale catalogue entry. It then moved into the hands of George Ortiz.

A year ago it was suggested that Sotheby's should contact the Greek authorities. Those negotiations appear to have concluded successfully.

The 4th century BC stele fragment, with the personal name, Hestiaios, will be displayed in the Epigraphic Museum in Athens. It appears to have come from a cemetery in Attica.