Michael Bennett stresses that the bronze Apollo now in Cleveland does not appear in the database of the Art Loss Register, "one of the world's largest databases of works registered as stolen or missing" (p. 67).
But what does this demonstrate?
First that the statue was not stolen from a recorded and documented collection (and had been reported to the ALR).
And second that images of the statue were not taken when the statue was buried in antiquity.
Perhaps Bennett could have explained the problematic use of the ALR for identifying recently surfaced archaeological material.
Discussion of the archaeological ethics surrounding the collecting of antiquities and archaeological material.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Another Bürki object returns to Italy
Source: MMA A psykter column-krater attributed to the Troilos painter was deaccessioned by New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art in June...
-
Source: Sotheby's A marble head of Alexander the Great has been seized in New York (reported in " Judge Orders Return of Ancien...
-
Source: ICE. There are times when you wonder if there is a lack of imagination when it comes to naming operations but 'Mummy's C...
-
Detail of the Sophilos dinos © David Gill The Sophilos dinos in the British Museum has been reconstructed from approximately 50 fragments. I...

No comments:
Post a Comment