Skip to main content

Egyptian Antiquities at Sotheby's


I have been plotting the sale of Egyptian antiquities at Sotheby's New York (see comments on December 2007). The June sale of antiquities raised some US$8,933,001 of which US$3,118,125 was for Egyptian items. This represents some 35% of the total value of the sale, and well above the average (15%) for the period from 1998. Egyptian antiquities fetched US$34 million for the same period (out of an overall total of US$225 million). Of these, over 65% first appear to be recorded after 1973, and just over 95% have no recorded find-spot.

The high prices on the non-Egyptian side included:
  • lot 13: Cycladic male figure: US$1,314,500
  • lot 28: Hellenistic bronze goddess: US$602,500
  • lot 32: marble head of Serapis Ammon: US$182,500
  • lot 38: chalcedony head of deified queen: US$962,500
  • lot 39: Late Republican marble portrait: US$374,500
  • lot 45: marble head of horse: US$110,500
  • lot 69: Bactrian bronze cosemtic vessel: US$116,500
  • lot 171: Byzantine mosaic fragment: US$170,500

Comments

Larry Rothfield said…
Fascinating data. But can you give us the n's for # of sales each year, and the median and mean prices? Otherwise it is difficult to tell whether we are seeing a shift in demand where prices are broadly higher, or whether the increase in total value is driven by the entry into the market of one or two major collectors. As you note, it only takes one Guennol lioness to skew things.

Am I right in concluding that the average revenue per annum from Sotheby New York antiquities sales 1998-2008 is $22.5 million?
Larry Rothfield said…
Great to have these statistics available!

It is a little hard to know what to make of the figures, though, without a better sense of: a) the n (how many pieces were sold); b) the median and mean. One question is whether changes year by year are being driven by a very small number of hugely expensive purchases, or whether there has been an increase at all pricing levels. The former might well indicate anxiety on the part of major collectors about prosecution or restitution claims, leading to bidding up the prices of well-provenanced pieces. Is there a correlation between how well-provenanced artifacts are and the prices they command? Do the 5% that have a recorded find spot generate more revenue per piece?
David Gill said…
Larry
A more detailed study will follow. The combined average annual income from the sale of antiquities at Sotheby's and Christie's (NY) is around US$ 27.6 million (taking the figures for 1999-2008). The annual average for Sotheby's (NY) for the period 1998-2008 (i.e. 11 years) is US $15.3 million.
Such figures are essentially for Egyptian, Greek, Roman, Near Eastern and Arabian antiquities.
Best wishes
David

Popular posts from this blog

Codename: Ainsbrook

I have been watching (UK) Channel 4's Time Team this evening. The programme looked at an undisclosed field (under a potato crop) where a Viking burial had been found. The location in Yorkshire was so sensitive that it was given a codename: Ainsbrook. Here is the summary:
In late 2003 two metal detectorists were working in a field in Yorkshire. They found 'treasure' buried just beneath the surface – a collection of Viking material next to a body. Although they had been detecting on the site for a number of years, during which time they had made large numbers of finds, nothing they had uncovered previously compared with this. They decided to share their discovery with archaeologists.The programme explored the tension between metal-detectorists and the English Heritage sponsored archaeologists putting six trenches into the field based on a geo-physical survey. Finds made by the metal-detectorists did not easily map onto the archaeological features.

Part of the programme had an …

George Ortiz collection to be displayed in London

Christie's is due to display part of the former collection of the late George Ortiz in London in a non-selling show to mark the 25th anniversary of the exhibition at the Royal Academy. There is a statement on the Christie's website ("The Ortiz Collection — ‘proof that the past is in all of us’"). Max Bernheimer is quoted: ‘Ortiz was one of the pre-eminent collectors of his day’.

We recall the associations with Ortiz such as the Horiuchi sarcophagus, the Hestiaios stele fragment, the marble funerary lekythos, and the Castor and Pollux.

Bernheimer will, no doubt, wish to reflect on the Royal Academy exhibition by reading Christopher Chippindale and David W. J. Gill. 2000. "Material consequences of contemporary classical collecting." American Journal of Archaeology 104: 463-511 [JSTOR].

Bernheimer will probably want to re-read the two pieces by Peter Watson that appeared in The Times: , "Ancient art without a history" and "Fakes - the artifice b…

Tutankhamun, Christie's and rigorous due dligence

It was announced today that the Egyptian authorities would be taking legal action against Christie's over the sale of the head of Tutankhamun ("Egypt to sue Christie's to retrieve £4.7m Tutankhamun bust", BBC News 9 July 2019).

The BBC reports:
Egypt's former antiquities chief, Zahi Hawass, said the bust appeared to have been "stolen" in the 1970s from the Temple of Karnak. "The owners have given false information," he told AFP news agency. "They have not shown any legal papers to prove its ownership." Christie's maintain the history of the piece as follows:
It stated that Germany's Prince Wilhelm von Thurn und Taxis reputedly had it in his collection by the 1960s, and that it was acquired by an Austrian dealer in 1973-4. However the family of von Thurn und Taxis claim that the head was never in that collection [see here].

Christie's reject any hint of criticism:
"Christie's would not and do not sell any work whe…