Skip to main content

Egyptian Antiquities at Sotheby's


I have been plotting the sale of Egyptian antiquities at Sotheby's New York (see comments on December 2007). The June sale of antiquities raised some US$8,933,001 of which US$3,118,125 was for Egyptian items. This represents some 35% of the total value of the sale, and well above the average (15%) for the period from 1998. Egyptian antiquities fetched US$34 million for the same period (out of an overall total of US$225 million). Of these, over 65% first appear to be recorded after 1973, and just over 95% have no recorded find-spot.

The high prices on the non-Egyptian side included:
  • lot 13: Cycladic male figure: US$1,314,500
  • lot 28: Hellenistic bronze goddess: US$602,500
  • lot 32: marble head of Serapis Ammon: US$182,500
  • lot 38: chalcedony head of deified queen: US$962,500
  • lot 39: Late Republican marble portrait: US$374,500
  • lot 45: marble head of horse: US$110,500
  • lot 69: Bactrian bronze cosemtic vessel: US$116,500
  • lot 171: Byzantine mosaic fragment: US$170,500

Comments

Larry Rothfield said…
Fascinating data. But can you give us the n's for # of sales each year, and the median and mean prices? Otherwise it is difficult to tell whether we are seeing a shift in demand where prices are broadly higher, or whether the increase in total value is driven by the entry into the market of one or two major collectors. As you note, it only takes one Guennol lioness to skew things.

Am I right in concluding that the average revenue per annum from Sotheby New York antiquities sales 1998-2008 is $22.5 million?
Larry Rothfield said…
Great to have these statistics available!

It is a little hard to know what to make of the figures, though, without a better sense of: a) the n (how many pieces were sold); b) the median and mean. One question is whether changes year by year are being driven by a very small number of hugely expensive purchases, or whether there has been an increase at all pricing levels. The former might well indicate anxiety on the part of major collectors about prosecution or restitution claims, leading to bidding up the prices of well-provenanced pieces. Is there a correlation between how well-provenanced artifacts are and the prices they command? Do the 5% that have a recorded find spot generate more revenue per piece?
David Gill said…
Larry
A more detailed study will follow. The combined average annual income from the sale of antiquities at Sotheby's and Christie's (NY) is around US$ 27.6 million (taking the figures for 1999-2008). The annual average for Sotheby's (NY) for the period 1998-2008 (i.e. 11 years) is US $15.3 million.
Such figures are essentially for Egyptian, Greek, Roman, Near Eastern and Arabian antiquities.
Best wishes
David

Popular posts from this blog

Codename: Ainsbrook

I have been watching (UK) Channel 4's Time Team this evening. The programme looked at an undisclosed field (under a potato crop) where a Viking burial had been found. The location in Yorkshire was so sensitive that it was given a codename: Ainsbrook. Here is the summary:
In late 2003 two metal detectorists were working in a field in Yorkshire. They found 'treasure' buried just beneath the surface – a collection of Viking material next to a body. Although they had been detecting on the site for a number of years, during which time they had made large numbers of finds, nothing they had uncovered previously compared with this. They decided to share their discovery with archaeologists.The programme explored the tension between metal-detectorists and the English Heritage sponsored archaeologists putting six trenches into the field based on a geo-physical survey. Finds made by the metal-detectorists did not easily map onto the archaeological features.

Part of the programme had an …

The scale of the returns to Italy

I have been busy working on an overview, "Returning Archaeological Objects to Italy". The scale of the returns to Italy from North American collections and galleries is staggering: in excess of 350 objects. This is clearly the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the material that has surfaced on the market without a history that can be traced back to the period before 1970. 

I will provide more information in due course, but the researcher is a reminder that we need to take due diligence seriously when it comes to making acquisitions.

Stele returns to Greece

The Hellenic Ministry of Culture has announced (Saturday 8 September 2018) that a stele that had been due to be auctioned at Sotheby's in London in June 2017 has been returned to Greece (Friday 7 September 2018). The identification had been made by Cambridge-based forensic archaeologist Dr Christos Tsirogiannis.

It appeared that the stele had been supplied with a falsified history as its presence with Becchina until 1990 contradicted the published sale catalogue entry. It then moved into the hands of George Ortiz.

A year ago it was suggested that Sotheby's should contact the Greek authorities. Those negotiations appear to have concluded successfully.

The 4th century BC stele fragment, with the personal name, Hestiaios, will be displayed in the Epigraphic Museum in Athens. It appears to have come from a cemetery in Attica.