Skip to main content

Al Jazeera, Zahi Hawass, and Egyptian antiquities

Lee Rosenbaum's CultureGrrl has drawn attention to Zahi Hawass' interview with Riz Khan (July 12, 2007) on Al Jazeera ("Rosetta Stone: Why the British Museum Distrusts Hawass").

There are several areas of interest in the interview. Hawass makes a distinction between items stolen from stores in Egypt, objects removed from archaeological sites, and high profile objects which reside in collections outside Egypt.

First, he talks about items stolen from archaeological stores in Egypt. This includes the Middle Kingdom alabaster duck that had been stolen from the store at Saqqara and had then surfaced at Christie's in New York. It has since been returned.

He then turned to the St Louis Art Museum and the Middle Kingdom mummy mask that Hawass claims was stolen from the Saqqara store.

Hawass was then questioned about the scale of the problem though no clear cut figure was given. I have noted elsewhere that Sotheby's in New York sold some $41 million worth of Egyptian antiquities between 1998 and 2007 of which I observe,
Nearly 70% of the Egyptian antiquities auctioned at Sotheby's New York appear to be unknown before 1973.

Hawass also talks about items which reside in European and North American collections. In particular he mentions his hope that several pieces will be loaned to ("visit") Egypt for the opening of the Grand Egyptian Museum. Among the pieces he hopes to borrow are the Rosetta Stone in London, the bust of Nefertiti in Berlin, the 4th Dynasty bust of Prince Ankhhaf ( "From Giza, tomb G 7510. 1925: excavated by the Harvard University-Boston Museum of Fine Arts Expedition; 1927: assigned to the MFA in the division of finds by the government of Egypt"), the Zodiac from the Dendera temple in Paris, and the statue of Hemiunnu in Hildesheim. The loan of Hemiunnu has now been agreed; Boston and the Louvre have declined to make loans. For Hawass the sanction is to "stop scientific co-operation".

As Rosenbaum observes, there may be more to these loans. As Hawass develops his theme, he states,
The Rosetta Stone is in England. We own that stone. The motherland should own this.
For interview


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Codename: Ainsbrook

I have been watching (UK) Channel 4's Time Team this evening. The programme looked at an undisclosed field (under a potato crop) where a Viking burial had been found. The location in Yorkshire was so sensitive that it was given a codename: Ainsbrook. Here is the summary:
In late 2003 two metal detectorists were working in a field in Yorkshire. They found 'treasure' buried just beneath the surface – a collection of Viking material next to a body. Although they had been detecting on the site for a number of years, during which time they had made large numbers of finds, nothing they had uncovered previously compared with this. They decided to share their discovery with archaeologists.The programme explored the tension between metal-detectorists and the English Heritage sponsored archaeologists putting six trenches into the field based on a geo-physical survey. Finds made by the metal-detectorists did not easily map onto the archaeological features.

Part of the programme had an …

George Ortiz collection to be displayed in London

Christie's is due to display part of the former collection of the late George Ortiz in London in a non-selling show to mark the 25th anniversary of the exhibition at the Royal Academy. There is a statement on the Christie's website ("The Ortiz Collection — ‘proof that the past is in all of us’"). Max Bernheimer is quoted: ‘Ortiz was one of the pre-eminent collectors of his day’.

We recall the associations with Ortiz such as the Horiuchi sarcophagus, the Hestiaios stele fragment, the marble funerary lekythos, and the Castor and Pollux.

Bernheimer will, no doubt, wish to reflect on the Royal Academy exhibition by reading Christopher Chippindale and David W. J. Gill. 2000. "Material consequences of contemporary classical collecting." American Journal of Archaeology 104: 463-511 [JSTOR].

Bernheimer will probably want to re-read the two pieces by Peter Watson that appeared in The Times: , "Ancient art without a history" and "Fakes - the artifice b…

Tutankhamun, Christie's and rigorous due dligence

It was announced today that the Egyptian authorities would be taking legal action against Christie's over the sale of the head of Tutankhamun ("Egypt to sue Christie's to retrieve £4.7m Tutankhamun bust", BBC News 9 July 2019).

The BBC reports:
Egypt's former antiquities chief, Zahi Hawass, said the bust appeared to have been "stolen" in the 1970s from the Temple of Karnak. "The owners have given false information," he told AFP news agency. "They have not shown any legal papers to prove its ownership." Christie's maintain the history of the piece as follows:
It stated that Germany's Prince Wilhelm von Thurn und Taxis reputedly had it in his collection by the 1960s, and that it was acquired by an Austrian dealer in 1973-4. However the family of von Thurn und Taxis claim that the head was never in that collection [see here].

Christie's reject any hint of criticism:
"Christie's would not and do not sell any work whe…