Skip to main content

Madrid: Indifference is not an option

Archaeologist Paul Barford has drawn my attention to a story in the Art Newspaper (Fabio Isman, "Looted from Italy and now in a major Spanish museum? Madrid’s National Archaeological Museum may have bought trafficked items", The Art Newspaper July 13, 2010). It is reported that 22 objects in Madrid's Museo Arqueologico Nacional can be traced back to Giacomo Medici or Gianfranco Becchina. The objects have been identified by images seized in Geneva and Basel.

It seems that the 22 pieces were acquired as part of a collection of 181 ancient objects purchased for $12 m in 1999 from collector José Luis Várez Fisa. The story about their identification is one that repeats itself from other museums, private collections, and dealers:
A few of them show objects still covered in mud—suggesting they had been recently (and illegally) unearthed—while others show the pieces in fragments, before the dealers sent them to be professionally restored. One object, an Apulian Bell Krater from 330BC that was later sold by Sotheby’s, appeared in a picture belonging to Medici that appears to have been taken in the Zurich workshop of the art restorers Fritz and Harry Bürki, a father-and-son team to whom leading antiquities dealer Robert Hecht (whose separate trial in Rome relating to the illicit trade is likely to end without a verdict because it has run out of time) sent works for restoration.
It appears that some pieces had passed through the Royal-Athena Galleries and other dealers:
Some of the objects in the Madrid catalogue have been published before, including in the German review Munzen und Medaillen, whose late owner was a close friend of Becchina, or by the leading New York antiquarian, Jerome Eisenberg, of the Royal-Athena Galleries. ... Nine of the Madrid artefacts were first published by Eisenberg between 1993 and 1997, in volumes of the gallery’s Art of the Ancient World. (Eisenberg counters that all the objects in his catalogues between 1988 and 2005 were checked by the Italian police, and that all—apart from eight objects that he voluntarily returned to Italy in 2007—were cleared by them.)
It should be noted that some of these items surfaced prior to the raids on Medici's premises in the Geneva Freeport in which the polaroids were seized. (For the 8 returned items see here.)

The article is keen to stress:
... there is no evidence of any dealing between José Luis Várez Fisa and Becchina or Medici, despite the large amount of paperwork seized from the pair, or that Fisa was aware of any problems in the provenance of the objects he acquired.
However the implications are clear:
Nevertheless the case demonstrates how easily all too many recent private collections were formed, and how some of the world’s most important museums (and not only those who knowingly connived to buy objects directly from the “traffickers”), bought antiquities that had been completely decontextualised from their past, with origins were at best extremely obscure. Will the Italian state try to reclaim at least some of the more important artefacts taken from under its soil? And, now that the National Archaeological Museum of Madrid knows all about the illicit provenance of many of its artefacts, will it pretend that nothing has happened? Indifference, surely, is not an option.
I have looked in the Beazley Archive database. One of the pieces illustrated in the article (with Medici Polaroid) appears there:

  • a. Madrid 1999.99.53. Collecting history: New York private collection; Sotheby-Parke-Bernet, New York 17 December 1997, lot 96. Publ. Bonet, P.C. (ed.), La coleccion Varez Fisa en el Museo Arqueologico Nacional, Septembre-Novembre 2003 (Madrid, 2003): 173-175, no. 57.


22 objects appear in the Beazley database (though not all appear to be linked to the 22 identified by the Italian authorities). I note that several of the pieces from the general collection surfaced in Sotheby's London in December 1982, May 1988, July 1994, and New York in June 1996; it should be stressed that these need not have been ex-Medici or ex-Becchina. At least one of the pieces had passed through the Graham Geddes collection, and another through Galerie Nefer in Zurich (see Galerie Nefer's link to returned objects). Others were purchased in 1997, just two years before the collection was sold.

It seems that the curatorial staff of the Museo Arqueologico Nacional have declined to comment. However it would be sensible for them to negotiate the return of the controversial pieces and follow in the line of other distinguished North American museums. The story is a good reminder of the toxic nature of the antiquities that passed through the hands of certain dealers.


Bookmark and Share so Your Real Friends Know that You Know

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Codename: Ainsbrook

I have been watching (UK) Channel 4's Time Team this evening. The programme looked at an undisclosed field (under a potato crop) where a Viking burial had been found. The location in Yorkshire was so sensitive that it was given a codename: Ainsbrook. Here is the summary:
In late 2003 two metal detectorists were working in a field in Yorkshire. They found 'treasure' buried just beneath the surface – a collection of Viking material next to a body. Although they had been detecting on the site for a number of years, during which time they had made large numbers of finds, nothing they had uncovered previously compared with this. They decided to share their discovery with archaeologists.The programme explored the tension between metal-detectorists and the English Heritage sponsored archaeologists putting six trenches into the field based on a geo-physical survey. Finds made by the metal-detectorists did not easily map onto the archaeological features.

Part of the programme had an …

George Ortiz collection to be displayed in London

Christie's is due to display part of the former collection of the late George Ortiz in London in a non-selling show to mark the 25th anniversary of the exhibition at the Royal Academy. There is a statement on the Christie's website ("The Ortiz Collection — ‘proof that the past is in all of us’"). Max Bernheimer is quoted: ‘Ortiz was one of the pre-eminent collectors of his day’.

We recall the associations with Ortiz such as the Horiuchi sarcophagus, the Hestiaios stele fragment, the marble funerary lekythos, and the Castor and Pollux.

Bernheimer will, no doubt, wish to reflect on the Royal Academy exhibition by reading Christopher Chippindale and David W. J. Gill. 2000. "Material consequences of contemporary classical collecting." American Journal of Archaeology 104: 463-511 [JSTOR].

Bernheimer will probably want to re-read the two pieces by Peter Watson that appeared in The Times: , "Ancient art without a history" and "Fakes - the artifice b…

Adding to the history of an Attic black-figured amphora

The post-excavation histories of objects are important as we map the that cultural property passes through collections and the markets. This is clear for an Attic black-figured amphora, attributed to Group E, that is due to be auctioned at Christie's New York on October 31, 2018 (lot 31). It shows Herakles and the Nemean lion, and Theseus and the Minotaur.

The auction catalogue claims that it surfaced in the hands of John Hewett in London in 1970 (or earlier), then to a private collection in Europe, followed by a series of auctions:
A European private collection; Antiquities  Sotheby's, London, 11 July 1988, lot 130thence to a private collection, New YorkAntiquities Christie's, New York, 15 December 1992, lot 81Antiquities Sotheby's, New York, 17 December 1996, lot 50Antiquities, Sotheby's, New York, 4 June 1998, lot 102 The amphora appears in the Beazley Archive (BAPD 350425). This provides the history sequence as follows (though in the list of auction catalogues s…