It is interesting to see how academics, museums, auction-houses and dealers present (or obscure) information. Can Swiss "private collection" in fact mean no more than "once dealer's stock in the Geneva Freeport"? Or could it mean "once stored in a warehouse in Basel"? Or is it genuinely the once cherished piece from the collection of a pot-loving Swiss private collector who values his or her anonymity?
What do such anonymous private collections hide? Where is the transparency?
And do museum curators try to investigate such anonymous "collectors"? Or do they take the information on trust?
What does it say about the "due diligence" process?
Do museums investigate when questions are raised?
Image
Detail of an Attic volute-krater showing a Dionysiac scene once in a Swiss "private collection" and featured in the Symes Dossier seized on Schinoussa (courtesy of Christos Tsirogiannis).
Discussion of the archaeological ethics surrounding the collecting of antiquities and archaeological material.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Another Bürki object returns to Italy
Source: MMA A psykter column-krater attributed to the Troilos painter was deaccessioned by New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art in June...
-
Source: Sotheby's A marble head of Alexander the Great has been seized in New York (reported in " Judge Orders Return of Ancien...
-
Tarentine funerary relief Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art The Manhattan DA has provided limited details about the recent return of antiqu...
-
Source: ICE. There are times when you wonder if there is a lack of imagination when it comes to naming operations but 'Mummy's C...

No comments:
Post a Comment