Skip to main content

"Interesting and long-established provenance"

Bonham's released a press statement prior to announce their 2010 sales of antiquities. One of their claims is:
The market for Classical and Egyptian antiquities is thriving, with artefacts of interesting and long-established provenance remaining highly sought after.
It is clear that 2009 was a better year than 2008. It would be hard to repeat the bad publicity generated by the sale of the Geddes collection in October 2008.

But how do you define "interesting and long-established provenance"? Is it possible to trace the collecting histories for items in the forthcoming sale back to 1970?

Robert Brooks, the chairman of Bonham's, made a statement in the wake of the "Geddes affair" : "we would welcome a greater openness on the part of the Italian Government". But what about the greater openness of Bonham's?

So what about the collecting histories of the three limestone Roman funerary busts that are in the April 2010 auction? Where did they reside between 1970 and 1998 (when they surfaced on the London market)? The period 1998 to 2010 is hardly "long-established". Do the pieces have an "interesting provenance"?

Rear of Roman limestone funerary bust.

Bookmark and Share so Your Real Friends Know that You Know


It seems that the Greeks showing interest have led to some lots being withdrawn. I posted here about a number of objects ( but I can now not find them in the Bonham auction catalogue...

Any information on that front?
David Gill said…
The gold wreath appears as Lot 240 [here]
Its collecting history is stated as follows:
"Private Swiss collection acquired between the 1930s-60s.
Acquired by the present owner at Sotheby's London, July 11th, 1988, lot 83."
Who consigned it to Sotheby's? What is the documentation for the Swiss private collection?
Thanks for the information.

The Catalogue search was not working when I tried it, but I now managed to trace all the objects I had mentioned in my article and updated it.

Popular posts from this blog

Marble bull's head from the temple of Eshmun

Excavations at the temple of Eshmun in Lebanon recovered a marble bull's head. It is now suggested that it was this head, apparently first published in 1967, that was placed on loan to New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art (Tom Mashberg, "Met Museum Turns Over Another Relic With Disputed Past to Prosecutors", New York Times August 1, 2017 ). The head is reported to have been handed over to the Manhattan district attorney after a request was received from the Lebanese authorities.

It is suggested that the head may have been looted from an archaeological storage area at Byblos in the 1980s during the Lebanese civil war. Mashberg has rehearsed the recent collecting history:
The owners of the bull’s head, Lynda and William Beierwaltes of Colorado, say they have clear title to the item and have sued Manhattan prosecutors for its return.  The Beierwaltes bought the head from a dealer in London in 1996 for more than $1 million and then sold it to another collector, Michael …

The Toledo skyphos and a Swiss private collection

The Attic red-figured skyphos attributed to the Kleophon painter in the Toledo Museum of Art (inv. 1982.88) is now coming under further scrutiny following the research of Dr Christos Tsirogiannis. The skyphos shows Hephaistos returning to Olympos.

Tsirogiannis has identified what appears to be this skyphos in five photographs in the Medici Dossier. The museum acknowledged that the skyphos had resided in a 'private Swiss collection'. Tsirogiannis suggests that this is probably a reference to Medici.

Enquiries to the museum by Tsirogiannis elicited the information that the skyphos had been acquired from Nicholas Koutoulakis (although that information does not appear on the museum's online catalogue).

The curatorial team at the Toledo Museum of Art will, no doubt, be contacting the Italian authorities to discuss the future residence of the skyphos.

For further discussion of the Toledo Museum of Art on LM see here.

Tsirogiannis, C. 2017. "Nekyia: Museum ethics an…

Metropolitan Museum of Art hands over Paestan krater

In May 2014 I commented on a Paestan krater acquired by New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art after it had been identified by Dr Christos Tsirogiannis in photographic images seized from Giacomo Medici. Tsirogiannis published his full concerns in the Journal of Art Crime in 2014, but it has taken a further three years for the museum to respond.

The krater showing Dionysos in a hand-drawn cart was purchased in 1989 from the Bothmer Purchase Fund (details from the Museum's website, inv. 1989.11.4). The krater surfaced through Sotheby's New York in June 1989.

It is unclear who consigned the krater to Sotheby's New York.

It has now been revealed that the krater has been handed over to the US authorities after a warrant had been issued (Tom Mashberg, "Ancient Vase Seized From Met Museum on Suspicion It Was Looted", New York Times July 31, 2018).

It appears that the museum did make an attempt to resolve the case in December 2016. Mashberg notes:
The Met, for its par…