Discussion of the archaeological ethics surrounding the collecting of antiquities and archaeological material.
Thursday, 22 April 2010
Smash and grab
There is something very disheartening when you see the results of looting. Objects ripped out of context. Pots broken into fragments. Sculptures smashed. So much damage to supply the market and the appetites of museums and private collectors.
Some collectors will claim that they are preserving the past, but really their desire is to own the past (and to ignore the consequences of the "owning" process).
Do auction-houses and dealers care how recently surfaced antiquities arrived on the market?
Image
Dirt encrusted Roman limestone funerary bust that passed through the stock of a European dealer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Further returns from the Getty announced
Source: The Getty Museum It has been announced that the Getty will be returning a further number of antiquities to Italy (" Getty Museu...
-
Source: Sotheby's A marble head of Alexander the Great has been seized in New York (reported in " Judge Orders Return of Ancien...
-
Photo: Becchina Archive Source: Christos Tsirogiannis An Attic black-figured amphora attributed to the manner of the Princeton painter has b...
-
James Cuno's Who Owns Antiquity? has received a series of critical reviews . Cuno has now responded on the Princeton University Press ...
1 comment:
When I was doing an MA in Britain, I recall a conversation with either a colleague or professor who told me about working in Ostia. Some years ago, he/she entered a tomb which was supposed to have been protected only to find it had been broken into. The ground was littered with cigarette butts and bottle caps and there was a also broken chainsaw blade on the floor. The figural relief on a sarcophagus in the tomb had been cut away by means of the chainsaw. Modern chisel and blade marks are apparent on so many sculptural works that enter the market without histories. One might say nauseating.
Damaging indeed.
Post a Comment