Skip to main content

Photographic Archives and Antiquities

The September 1995 raid on the Geneva Freeport premises of Giacomo Medici brought to light a major archive of some 4000 photographs. These images, some Polaroids, have been used by the Italian authorities to identify objects that have passed into public and private collections. By my estimate less than 1% of the items identified in the photographs have been returned to Italy.

The objects featured in the Geneva Polaroids are reported to include:


Other major sets of photographs have been seized from a Basel warehouse (approximately 10,000 images) and on the Greek island of Schinoussa. Research on this material will undoubtedly lead to further identifications. A related set of images show objects once handled by the Swiss-based conservator Fritz Bürki.

Other pieces identified by unspecified photographic archives:



Bookmark and Share so Your Real Friends Know that You Know

Comments

Mark said…
Out of curiosity, why have the photographs not been released to the public, or even the Art Loss Register? Why not take a proactive approach as opposed to reactive each time one of the objects is set for auction? Is there fear that the objects will be driven "underground?" Whether or not that would happen is quite debatable.
David Gill said…
Mark
You are assuming that (some of) the photographs are not on the ALR.
Best wishes
David
How hard would it be to compare photos of objects that come on sale to these photos using image-recognition software?

"Find photos like this" would at least be one way of looking for matches.

iPhoto can find lots of faces, and surely there are comparable things for objects. The auction houses would do this.

(I am assuming here that the auction houses are not simply ignoring what they know to be matches already.)
David Gill said…
John
Image recognition software is here - and similar to the feature you mention on iPhoto for faces.
I hope that auction-houses are not ignoring identifications. We await a statement from the Art Loss Register. I have been in touch with two of their staff this week but you will have to be patient.
Best wishes
David
Alexandre said…
You are right David, Image Recognition software is there! It can very robustly recognize pictures of known paintings (stolen or not) on auction sites, or using a mobile phone or device in real antique stores. It is has been used by some police forces as well as insurance companies for 3-4 years now. For example see http://ltutech.com/clients/argos or or http://ltutech.com/en/clients/france-ocbc

The problem for police forces: stolen art teams are overall not very well funded, and can not always acquire the software or hardware they need. ALR will probably end up acquiring these technologies too.

All in all, it would be a great progress to generalize these tecnologies! It would make it so much harder to resell stolen art online...

Disclaimer: I am the CEO of www.ltutech.com, and we make image recognition tech bricks (basically, the algorithms) to build such software.

Popular posts from this blog

The Getty Kouros: "The moral is, never ever buy a piece without a provenance"

In the wake of the 1992 Athens conference to discuss the Getty kouros (85.AA.40), one of the delegates, a "distinguished" American museum curator, was quoted ("Greek sculpture; the age-old question", The Economist June 20, 1992):
The moral is, never ever buy a piece without a provenance.
The recent discussions about the return of antiquities from North American museums to Italy and Greece may seem far removed from the acquisition of what appears to be a forged archaic Greek sculpture in the 1980s. However, there are some surprising overlaps.

The statue arrived at the Getty on September 18, 1983 in seven pieces. True (1993: 11) subsequently asked two questions:
Where was it found? As it was said to have been in a Swiss private collection for fifty years, why had it never been reassembled, though it was virtually complete?
A similar statue surfacing in the 1930s
A decision was taken to acquire the kouros in 1985. The official Getty line at the time (and reported in Russell…

Symes and a Roman medical set

Pierre Bergé & Associés of Paris are offering a rare Roman bronze medical set (16 May 2018, lot 236). Its recorded history is: "Ancienne collection Hishiguro, Tokyo, 1992". The catalogue entry helpfully informs us that the set probably came from a burial ("Cette trousse de chirurgien a probablement été découverte dans une sépulture ...").

The set appears to be the one that has been identified by Dr Christos Tsirogannis from an image in the Schinousa archive thus linking it to Robin Symes.

Given that the catalogue entry suggests that this piece came from a funerary context and that the history of the piece can only be traced back to 1992 (and not to 1970), questions are being raised about the set's origins.

What due diligence was conducted on the medical set prior to offering it for sale? Did Symes sell the set to Hishiguro? How did Symes obtain the set? Who sold it to him?

I understand that the appropriate authorities in France are being informed about the …

The Minoan Larnax and the Michael C. Carlos Museum

I was recently asked to comment on the acquisition of recently surfaced antiquities in Greece as part of an interview. One of the examples I gave was the Minoan larnax that was acquired by the Michael C. Carlos Museum. Although this piece has been discussed in the Greek press, the museum has not yet responded to the apparent identification in the Becchina archive.

Is the time now right for the Michael C. Carlos Museum or the wider authorities at Emory University to negotiate the return of this impressive piece so that it can be placed on display in a museum in Greece?